Directions Read the given passage carefully and attempt the questions that follow. It is an old saying that knowledge is power. Education is an instrument, which imparts knowledge and therefore, indirectly controls power. Therefore, ever since the dawn of our civilization, persons in power have always tried to supervise or control education. It has been handmaid of the ruling class. During the Christian Ara, the ecclesiastics controlled the institution of education and diffused among the people the gospel of the Bible and religious teachings. These gospels and teachings were no other than a philosophy for the maintenance of the existing society. It taught the poor man to be meek and to earn his bread with the sweat of his brow, while the priests and the landlords lived in luxury and fought duels for the slightest offence. During the Renaissance, education passed more from the clutches of the priest into the hands of the prince. In other words, it became more secular. Under the control of the monarch, education began to devise and preach the infallibility of its masters, the monarch or king. It also invented and supported fantastic theories like "The Divine Right Theory' and that the king can do no wrong etc. With the advent of the industrial revolution, education took a different turn and had to please the new masters. It now no longer remained the privilege of the baron class, but was thrown open to the new rich merchant class of the society. The philosophy, which was in vogue during this period was that of Taissez Faire' restricting the function of the state to a mere keeping of laws and order while on the other hand, in practice the law of the jungle prevailed in the form of free competition and the survival of the fittest.
What does the theory 'Divine Right of King' stipulate?
A)
The kings are God
doneclear
B)
That the right of governing is conferred upon the kings by God
doneclear
C)
They have the right to be worshipped like Gods by their subjects
doneclear
D)
That the right of kings are divine and therefore sacred
Directions Read the given passage carefully and attempt the questions that follow. It is an old saying that knowledge is power. Education is an instrument, which imparts knowledge and therefore, indirectly controls power. Therefore, ever since the dawn of our civilization, persons in power have always tried to supervise or control education. It has been handmaid of the ruling class. During the Christian Ara, the ecclesiastics controlled the institution of education and diffused among the people the gospel of the Bible and religious teachings. These gospels and teachings were no other than a philosophy for the maintenance of the existing society. It taught the poor man to be meek and to earn his bread with the sweat of his brow, while the priests and the landlords lived in luxury and fought duels for the slightest offence. During the Renaissance, education passed more from the clutches of the priest into the hands of the prince. In other words, it became more secular. Under the control of the monarch, education began to devise and preach the infallibility of its masters, the monarch or king. It also invented and supported fantastic theories like "The Divine Right Theory' and that the king can do no wrong etc. With the advent of the industrial revolution, education took a different turn and had to please the new masters. It now no longer remained the privilege of the baron class, but was thrown open to the new rich merchant class of the society. The philosophy, which was in vogue during this period was that of Taissez Faire' restricting the function of the state to a mere keeping of laws and order while on the other hand, in practice the law of the jungle prevailed in the form of free competition and the survival of the fittest.
Directions Read the given passage carefully and attempt the questions that follow. It is an old saying that knowledge is power. Education is an instrument, which imparts knowledge and therefore, indirectly controls power. Therefore, ever since the dawn of our civilization, persons in power have always tried to supervise or control education. It has been handmaid of the ruling class. During the Christian Ara, the ecclesiastics controlled the institution of education and diffused among the people the gospel of the Bible and religious teachings. These gospels and teachings were no other than a philosophy for the maintenance of the existing society. It taught the poor man to be meek and to earn his bread with the sweat of his brow, while the priests and the landlords lived in luxury and fought duels for the slightest offence. During the Renaissance, education passed more from the clutches of the priest into the hands of the prince. In other words, it became more secular. Under the control of the monarch, education began to devise and preach the infallibility of its masters, the monarch or king. It also invented and supported fantastic theories like "The Divine Right Theory' and that the king can do no wrong etc. With the advent of the industrial revolution, education took a different turn and had to please the new masters. It now no longer remained the privilege of the baron class, but was thrown open to the new rich merchant class of the society. The philosophy, which was in vogue during this period was that of Taissez Faire' restricting the function of the state to a mere keeping of laws and order while on the other hand, in practice the law of the jungle prevailed in the form of free competition and the survival of the fittest.
What did the ruling class in the Christian Era think of the poor man?
Directions Read the given passage carefully and attempt the questions that follow. It is an old saying that knowledge is power. Education is an instrument, which imparts knowledge and therefore, indirectly controls power. Therefore, ever since the dawn of our civilization, persons in power have always tried to supervise or control education. It has been handmaid of the ruling class. During the Christian Ara, the ecclesiastics controlled the institution of education and diffused among the people the gospel of the Bible and religious teachings. These gospels and teachings were no other than a philosophy for the maintenance of the existing society. It taught the poor man to be meek and to earn his bread with the sweat of his brow, while the priests and the landlords lived in luxury and fought duels for the slightest offence. During the Renaissance, education passed more from the clutches of the priest into the hands of the prince. In other words, it became more secular. Under the control of the monarch, education began to devise and preach the infallibility of its masters, the monarch or king. It also invented and supported fantastic theories like "The Divine Right Theory' and that the king can do no wrong etc. With the advent of the industrial revolution, education took a different turn and had to please the new masters. It now no longer remained the privilege of the baron class, but was thrown open to the new rich merchant class of the society. The philosophy, which was in vogue during this period was that of Taissez Faire' restricting the function of the state to a mere keeping of laws and order while on the other hand, in practice the law of the jungle prevailed in the form of free competition and the survival of the fittest.
Who controlled the institution of education during the Christian Era?
Directions Read the given passage carefully and attempt the questions that follow. It is an old saying that knowledge is power. Education is an instrument, which imparts knowledge and therefore, indirectly controls power. Therefore, ever since the dawn of our civilization, persons in power have always tried to supervise or control education. It has been handmaid of the ruling class. During the Christian Ara, the ecclesiastics controlled the institution of education and diffused among the people the gospel of the Bible and religious teachings. These gospels and teachings were no other than a philosophy for the maintenance of the existing society. It taught the poor man to be meek and to earn his bread with the sweat of his brow, while the priests and the landlords lived in luxury and fought duels for the slightest offence. During the Renaissance, education passed more from the clutches of the priest into the hands of the prince. In other words, it became more secular. Under the control of the monarch, education began to devise and preach the infallibility of its masters, the monarch or king. It also invented and supported fantastic theories like "The Divine Right Theory' and that the king can do no wrong etc. With the advent of the industrial revolution, education took a different turn and had to please the new masters. It now no longer remained the privilege of the baron class, but was thrown open to the new rich merchant class of the society. The philosophy, which was in vogue during this period was that of Taissez Faire' restricting the function of the state to a mere keeping of laws and order while on the other hand, in practice the law of the jungle prevailed in the form of free competition and the survival of the fittest.
What does the word 'fallibility' mean?
A)
That every man is open to error
doneclear
B)
Sensitivity
doneclear
C)
The virtue of not making mistake
doneclear
D)
That some divine power is responsible for determining the fate of the man
Directions Read the given passage carefully and attempt the questions that follow. It is an old saying that knowledge is power. Education is an instrument, which imparts knowledge and therefore, indirectly controls power. Therefore, ever since the dawn of our civilization, persons in power have always tried to supervise or control education. It has been handmaid of the ruling class. During the Christian Ara, the ecclesiastics controlled the institution of education and diffused among the people the gospel of the Bible and religious teachings. These gospels and teachings were no other than a philosophy for the maintenance of the existing society. It taught the poor man to be meek and to earn his bread with the sweat of his brow, while the priests and the landlords lived in luxury and fought duels for the slightest offence. During the Renaissance, education passed more from the clutches of the priest into the hands of the prince. In other words, it became more secular. Under the control of the monarch, education began to devise and preach the infallibility of its masters, the monarch or king. It also invented and supported fantastic theories like "The Divine Right Theory' and that the king can do no wrong etc. With the advent of the industrial revolution, education took a different turn and had to please the new masters. It now no longer remained the privilege of the baron class, but was thrown open to the new rich merchant class of the society. The philosophy, which was in vogue during this period was that of Taissez Faire' restricting the function of the state to a mere keeping of laws and order while on the other hand, in practice the law of the jungle prevailed in the form of free competition and the survival of the fittest.
Directions Read the given passage carefully and attempt the questions that follow. It is an old saying that knowledge is power. Education is an instrument, which imparts knowledge and therefore, indirectly controls power. Therefore, ever since the dawn of our civilization, persons in power have always tried to supervise or control education. It has been handmaid of the ruling class. During the Christian Ara, the ecclesiastics controlled the institution of education and diffused among the people the gospel of the Bible and religious teachings. These gospels and teachings were no other than a philosophy for the maintenance of the existing society. It taught the poor man to be meek and to earn his bread with the sweat of his brow, while the priests and the landlords lived in luxury and fought duels for the slightest offence. During the Renaissance, education passed more from the clutches of the priest into the hands of the prince. In other words, it became more secular. Under the control of the monarch, education began to devise and preach the infallibility of its masters, the monarch or king. It also invented and supported fantastic theories like "The Divine Right Theory' and that the king can do no wrong etc. With the advent of the industrial revolution, education took a different turn and had to please the new masters. It now no longer remained the privilege of the baron class, but was thrown open to the new rich merchant class of the society. The philosophy, which was in vogue during this period was that of Taissez Faire' restricting the function of the state to a mere keeping of laws and order while on the other hand, in practice the law of the jungle prevailed in the form of free competition and the survival of the fittest.
What does the policy of 'Laissez Faire' stand for?
A)
Individual freedom in the economic field
doneclear
B)
State control over law and order in society
doneclear
C)
Joint control of the means of production by the state and private enterprise
Directions Read the given passage carefully and attempt the questions that follow. It is an old saying that knowledge is power. Education is an instrument, which imparts knowledge and therefore, indirectly controls power. Therefore, ever since the dawn of our civilization, persons in power have always tried to supervise or control education. It has been handmaid of the ruling class. During the Christian Ara, the ecclesiastics controlled the institution of education and diffused among the people the gospel of the Bible and religious teachings. These gospels and teachings were no other than a philosophy for the maintenance of the existing society. It taught the poor man to be meek and to earn his bread with the sweat of his brow, while the priests and the landlords lived in luxury and fought duels for the slightest offence. During the Renaissance, education passed more from the clutches of the priest into the hands of the prince. In other words, it became more secular. Under the control of the monarch, education began to devise and preach the infallibility of its masters, the monarch or king. It also invented and supported fantastic theories like "The Divine Right Theory' and that the king can do no wrong etc. With the advent of the industrial revolution, education took a different turn and had to please the new masters. It now no longer remained the privilege of the baron class, but was thrown open to the new rich merchant class of the society. The philosophy, which was in vogue during this period was that of Taissez Faire' restricting the function of the state to a mere keeping of laws and order while on the other hand, in practice the law of the jungle prevailed in the form of free competition and the survival of the fittest.
Directions Read the given passage carefully and attempt the questions that follow. It is an old saying that knowledge is power. Education is an instrument, which imparts knowledge and therefore, indirectly controls power. Therefore, ever since the dawn of our civilization, persons in power have always tried to supervise or control education. It has been handmaid of the ruling class. During the Christian Ara, the ecclesiastics controlled the institution of education and diffused among the people the gospel of the Bible and religious teachings. These gospels and teachings were no other than a philosophy for the maintenance of the existing society. It taught the poor man to be meek and to earn his bread with the sweat of his brow, while the priests and the landlords lived in luxury and fought duels for the slightest offence. During the Renaissance, education passed more from the clutches of the priest into the hands of the prince. In other words, it became more secular. Under the control of the monarch, education began to devise and preach the infallibility of its masters, the monarch or king. It also invented and supported fantastic theories like "The Divine Right Theory' and that the king can do no wrong etc. With the advent of the industrial revolution, education took a different turn and had to please the new masters. It now no longer remained the privilege of the baron class, but was thrown open to the new rich merchant class of the society. The philosophy, which was in vogue during this period was that of Taissez Faire' restricting the function of the state to a mere keeping of laws and order while on the other hand, in practice the law of the jungle prevailed in the form of free competition and the survival of the fittest.
Choose the correct synonym out of the four choices given. Gospel
Directions Read the given passage carefully and attempt the questions that follow. It is an old saying that knowledge is power. Education is an instrument, which imparts knowledge and therefore, indirectly controls power. Therefore, ever since the dawn of our civilization, persons in power have always tried to supervise or control education. It has been handmaid of the ruling class. During the Christian Ara, the ecclesiastics controlled the institution of education and diffused among the people the gospel of the Bible and religious teachings. These gospels and teachings were no other than a philosophy for the maintenance of the existing society. It taught the poor man to be meek and to earn his bread with the sweat of his brow, while the priests and the landlords lived in luxury and fought duels for the slightest offence. During the Renaissance, education passed more from the clutches of the priest into the hands of the prince. In other words, it became more secular. Under the control of the monarch, education began to devise and preach the infallibility of its masters, the monarch or king. It also invented and supported fantastic theories like "The Divine Right Theory' and that the king can do no wrong etc. With the advent of the industrial revolution, education took a different turn and had to please the new masters. It now no longer remained the privilege of the baron class, but was thrown open to the new rich merchant class of the society. The philosophy, which was in vogue during this period was that of Taissez Faire' restricting the function of the state to a mere keeping of laws and order while on the other hand, in practice the law of the jungle prevailed in the form of free competition and the survival of the fittest.
Choose the correct synonym out of the four choices given. Vogue
A)
uncertain
doneclear
B)
outdated
doneclear
C)
the prevailing fashion or style
doneclear
D)
Ans. Vogue' means 'fashion', so the option [c] which is the prevailing fashion or style would be suitable. journey
Directions The sentences given in each question, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Each sentence is labeled with a letter. Choose the most logical order of sentences from among the given choices to construct a coherent paragraph.
A: People who start up their own business typically come from two extreme backgrounds: One is the business family background and the other is a steady professional family background.
B: Typically, people from different backgrounds face different kinds of basic problems.
C: The people from both the backgrounds find it very difficult to establish and manage an enterprise.
D: Starting up and managing a small business is no joke.
Directions The sentences given in each question, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Each sentence is labeled with a letter. Choose the most logical order of sentences from among the given choices to construct a coherent paragraph.
A: Venture capital is recommended as the ideal source of financing for a successfully small business.
B: Several companies including startups have been funded by dedicated venture funds during this decade.
C: Despite this, an average Indian entrepreneur understands and appreciation of venture capital concept has been woefully inadequate.
D: In the Indian context, though venture capital has been a relatively late entrant, it has already made a reasonable impact.
Directions The sentences given in each question, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Each sentence is labeled with a letter. Choose the most logical order of sentences from among the given choices to construct a coherent paragraph.
A: Progress in diagnosis, in preventive Medicine and in treatment, both medicinal and surgical, has been rapid and breathe taking.
B: Much in medicine which is not taken for granted was undreamt of even as recently as 20yer ago.
C: Presently small pox has been eradicated, poliomyelitis practically banished, tuberculosis has become curable and coronary artery disease surgically relievable.
D: The dramatic surge in the field of molecular biology and research by immunologists and geneticists has succeeded in controlling parasitic diseases like malaria and river blindness that affect millions of people round the world.
Directions The sentences given in each question, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Each sentence is labeled with a letter. Choose the most logical order of sentences from among the given choices to construct a coherent paragraph.
A: Instead, many deaths and injuries result from falling objects and the collapse of buildings, bridges and other structures.
B: Earthquakes almost never kill people directly.
C: Fire resulting from broken gas or power lines is another major danger during a quake.
D: Spills of hazardous chemicals are also a concern during an earthquake.
Directions The sentences given in each question, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Each sentence is labeled with a letter. Choose the most logical order of sentences from among the given choices to construct a coherent paragraph.
A: The Winchester or hard disk drives can store much more data than what can be stored on a floppy diskette.
B: Hard disks come sealed and they cannot be removed or changed like floppy diskettes.
C: Often floppy disk system is used in conjunction with the Winchester disk system.
D: This makes for an ideal system for secondary storage,
question_answer47) In a school for midday meal food is sufficient for 250 students for 33 days, if each student is given 125 g meal 80 more students joined the school. If same amount of meal is given to each student, then the food will last for
question_answer48) In a school of 500 students, 102 students can read Hindi and Tamil both, 200 students can read only Hindi, The students who can read only Tarn are
question_answer50) Table shows the daily expenditure on food of 25 households in a locality 100-150, 150-200, 200-250, 250-300 and 300-350 Households 4 5 12 2 2 The mean daily expenditure on food is
question_answer51) A box contains 24 marbles, some are green and others are blue. If a marble is drawn at random from the jar, the probability that it is green is 2/3. The number of blue balls in the jar is
question_answer56) Two straight poles of unequal length stand upright on a ground. The length of the shorter pole is 10 m. A pole joins the top of the two vertical poles. The distance between the two tops is 5 m. The distance between the poles along the ground is 4 m. The area thus formed by the three poles with the ground is
question_answer57) Pipe A can fill a tank in 10 h and pipe B can fill the same tank in 12 h. Both the pipes are opened to fill the tank and after 3 h pipe A is closed. Pipe B will fill the remaining part of the tank in
question_answer58) A ground \[100\times 80\,\,{{\text{m}}^{\text{2}}}\] has, two cross roads in its middle. The road parallel to the length is 5 m wide and the other road is 4 m wide, both roads are perpendicular to each other. The cost of laying the bricks at the rate of Rs 10 per m2, on the roads, will be
question_answer65) Dr. Norman Borlaug is famous as father of the Green Revolution in 1960s. His initial goal was to create varieties of wheat adapted to the climate of
question_answer99) In the month of March, 2013 the Supreme Court of India issued a notice that the ambassador of the following country shall not leave India without the permission of the Supreme Court.
Directions Answer the following questions based on the statements given below. (i) There are 3 poles on each side of the road. (ii) The se six poles are labeled A, B, C, D, E and F. (iii) The poles are of different colours namely Golden, Silver, Metallic, Black, Bronze and White. (iv) The poles are of different heights. (v) E, the tallest pole, is exactly opposite to the Golden colored pole. (vi) The shortest pole is exactly opposite to the Metallic colored pole. (vii) F, the Black colored pole, is located between A and D. (viii) C, the Bronze colored pole, is exactly opposite to A. (ix) B, the Metallic colored pole, is exactly opposite to F. (x) A, the White colored pole, is taller than C but shorter than D and B.
What is the colour of the pole diagonally opposite to the Bronze coloured pole?
Directions Answer the following questions based on the statements given below. (i) There are 3 poles on each side of the road. (ii) The se six poles are labeled A, B, C, D, E and F. (iii) The poles are of different colours namely Golden, Silver, Metallic, Black, Bronze and White. (iv) The poles are of different heights. (v) E, the tallest pole, is exactly opposite to the Golden colored pole. (vi) The shortest pole is exactly opposite to the Metallic colored pole. (vii) F, the Black colored pole, is located between A and D. (viii) C, the Bronze colored pole, is exactly opposite to A. (ix) B, the Metallic colored pole, is exactly opposite to F. (x) A, the White colored pole, is taller than C but shorter than D and B.
Directions Answer the following questions based on the statements given below. (i) There are 3 poles on each side of the road. (ii) The se six poles are labeled A, B, C, D, E and F. (iii) The poles are of different colours namely Golden, Silver, Metallic, Black, Bronze and White. (iv) The poles are of different heights. (v) E, the tallest pole, is exactly opposite to the Golden colored pole. (vi) The shortest pole is exactly opposite to the Metallic colored pole. (vii) F, the Black colored pole, is located between A and D. (viii) C, the Bronze colored pole, is exactly opposite to A. (ix) B, the Metallic colored pole, is exactly opposite to F. (x) A, the White colored pole, is taller than C but shorter than D and B.
Directions Answer the questions on the basis of the information given below. The head of a newly formed Government desires to appoint five of the six elected ministers P, Q, R, S, T and U to portfolios of Foreign, Industry and Commerce, Agriculture, Rural Development and Human Resources. U does not want any portfolio if S gets one of the five. R wants either Foreign or Human Resources or no portfolio. Q says that if S gets industry and Commerce or Rural Development then she must get the other one. T insists on a portfolio if P gets one.
Which of the following is a valid assignment?
A)
P-Foreign, Q-industry and Commerce, R-Agriculture, S-Rural Development, T-Human Resources
doneclear
B)
R-Foreign, S-industry and Commerce, P-Agriculture, Q-Rural Development, T-Human Resources
doneclear
C)
P-Foreign, Q-industry and Commerce, T-Agriculture, S-Rural Development, U-Human Resources
doneclear
D)
Q-Foreign, U-industry and Commerce, T-Agriculture, R-Rural Development, P-Human Resource
Directions Answer the questions on the basis of the information given below. The head of a newly formed Government desires to appoint five of the six elected ministers P, Q, R, S, T and U to portfolios of Foreign, Industry and Commerce, Agriculture, Rural Development and Human Resources. U does not want any portfolio if S gets one of the five. R wants either Foreign or Human Resources or no portfolio. Q says that if S gets industry and Commerce or Rural Development then she must get the other one. T insists on a portfolio if P gets one.
If P gets Foreign and R gets Human Resources, then which is not a valid assignment of Agriculture and Rural Development?
Directions In each of the following questions, a related pair of words is followed by four pairs of words or phrases. Select the pair that best expresses a relationship similar to the one expressed in the question pair.
Directions In each of the following questions, a related pair of words is followed by four pairs of words or phrases. Select the pair that best expresses a relationship similar to the one expressed in the question pair.
Directions In each of the following questions, a related pair of words is followed by four pairs of words or phrases. Select the pair that best expresses a relationship similar to the one expressed in the question pair.
Directions In each of the following questions, a related pair of words is followed by four pairs of words or phrases. Select the pair that best expresses a relationship similar to the one expressed in the question pair.
Directions In each of the following questions, a related pair of words is followed by four pairs of words or phrases. Select the pair that best expresses a relationship similar to the one expressed in the question pair.
Directions Each question contains a statement on relationship and a question regarding relationship based on the statement. Select the correct option.
Deepak said to Nitin, "That boy playing with the football is the younger of the two brothers of the daughter of my father's wife". How is the boy playing football related to Deepak?
Directions Read the information given below to answer the questions. (i) Kareena's dieting schedule consists of having only one fruit on a given day of the week. (ii) Dietician has prescribed banana, papaya, pomegranate, apple and grape from Sunday to Friday, one day being a fasting day. Kareena cannot eat any fruit on Saturday. (iii) Pomegranate day is neither on the first day nor on the last day but earlier than the papaya day. (iv) Apple day is on the immediate next day of papaya day. (v) Banana day is on the immediate previous day of the fasting day. (vi) Apple day and grape day must have a gap of two days between them. (vii) Grape day is the day immediately following the fasting day.
Directions Read the information given below to answer the questions. (i) Kareena's dieting schedule consists of having only one fruit on a given day of the week. (ii) Dietician has prescribed banana, papaya, pomegranate, apple and grape from Sunday to Friday, one day being a fasting day. Kareena cannot eat any fruit on Saturday. (iii) Pomegranate day is neither on the first day nor on the last day but earlier than the papaya day. (iv) Apple day is on the immediate next day of papaya day. (v) Banana day is on the immediate previous day of the fasting day. (vi) Apple day and grape day must have a gap of two days between them. (vii) Grape day is the day immediately following the fasting day.
Banana day and apple day have a gap of how many days between them?
Directions Read the information given below to answer the questions. (i) Kareena's dieting schedule consists of having only one fruit on a given day of the week. (ii) Dietician has prescribed banana, papaya, pomegranate, apple and grape from Sunday to Friday, one day being a fasting day. Kareena cannot eat any fruit on Saturday. (iii) Pomegranate day is neither on the first day nor on the last day but earlier than the papaya day. (iv) Apple day is on the immediate next day of papaya day. (v) Banana day is on the immediate previous day of the fasting day. (vi) Apple day and grape day must have a gap of two days between them. (vii) Grape day is the day immediately following the fasting day.
Directions Read the information given below to answer the questions. (i) Kareena's dieting schedule consists of having only one fruit on a given day of the week. (ii) Dietician has prescribed banana, papaya, pomegranate, apple and grape from Sunday to Friday, one day being a fasting day. Kareena cannot eat any fruit on Saturday. (iii) Pomegranate day is neither on the first day nor on the last day but earlier than the papaya day. (iv) Apple day is on the immediate next day of papaya day. (v) Banana day is on the immediate previous day of the fasting day. (vi) Apple day and grape day must have a gap of two days between them. (vii) Grape day is the day immediately following the fasting day.
Directions Read the information given below to answer the questions. (i) Kareena's dieting schedule consists of having only one fruit on a given day of the week. (ii) Dietician has prescribed banana, papaya, pomegranate, apple and grape from Sunday to Friday, one day being a fasting day. Kareena cannot eat any fruit on Saturday. (iii) Pomegranate day is neither on the first day nor on the last day but earlier than the papaya day. (iv) Apple day is on the immediate next day of papaya day. (v) Banana day is on the immediate previous day of the fasting day. (vi) Apple day and grape day must have a gap of two days between them. (vii) Grape day is the day immediately following the fasting day.
Directions Each question contains one statement and two courses of action I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, decide which of the two courses of action most logically follows.
Directions Each question contains one statement and two courses of action 1 and 11. Assuming the statements to be true, decide which of the two courses of action most logically follows.
Directions Each question contains one statement and two courses of action 1 and 11. Assuming the statements to be true, decide which of the two courses of action most logically follows.
Directions Each question contains one statement and two courses of action 1 and 11. Assuming the statements to be true, decide which of the two courses of action most logically follows.
Directions Each question contains one statement and two courses of action 1 and 11. Assuming the statements to be true, decide which of the two courses of action most logically follows.
Direction In each question below are two statements numbered 1 and You have to take the two statements as true even, if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements I. All vegetables have gravy. I. All lunch has vegetable.
Direction In each question below are two statements numbered 1 and You have to take the two statements as true even, if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Direction In each question below are two statements numbered 1 and You have to take the two statements as true even, if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Direction In each question below are two statements numbered 1 and You have to take the two statements as true even, if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Direction In each question below are two statements numbered 1 and You have to take the two statements as true even, if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Directions Read the information given below to answer the questions. A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H want to have a dinner on a round table and they have worked out the following seating arrangements. (i) A will sit beside C. (ii) H will sit beside A. (iii) C will sit beside E. (iv) F will sit beside H. (v) E will sit beside G. (vi) D will sit beside F. (vii) G will beside B. (viii) B will sit beside D.
Directions Read the information given below to answer the questions. A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H want to have a dinner on a round table and they have worked out the following seating arrangements. (i) A will sit beside C. (ii) H will sit beside A. (iii) C will sit beside E. (iv) F will sit beside H. (v) E will sit beside G. (vi) D will sit beside F. (vii) G will beside B. (viii) B will sit beside D.
Directions Read the information given below to answer the questions. A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H want to have a dinner on a round table and they have worked out the following seating arrangements. (i) A will sit beside C. (ii) H will sit beside A. (iii) C will sit beside E. (iv) F will sit beside H. (v) E will sit beside G. (vi) D will sit beside F. (vii) G will beside B. (viii) B will sit beside D.
Directions Read the information given below to answer the questions. A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H want to have a dinner on a round table and they have worked out the following seating arrangements. (i) A will sit beside C. (ii) H will sit beside A. (iii) C will sit beside E. (iv) F will sit beside H. (v) E will sit beside G. (vi) D will sit beside F. (vii) G will beside B. (viii) B will sit beside D.
Directions Read the information given below to answer the questions. A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H want to have a dinner on a round table and they have worked out the following seating arrangements. (i) A will sit beside C. (ii) H will sit beside A. (iii) C will sit beside E. (iv) F will sit beside H. (v) E will sit beside G. (vi) D will sit beside F. (vii) G will beside B. (viii) B will sit beside D.
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle When an offer is accepted by a person to whom it is made, it becomes a promise. But this promise will become legally binding only when the acceptance of the offer is unconditional. Facts Ram makes an offer to sell his house to Shyam for. Rs 50 lakh. Shyam accepts this offer but wants to pay the price of the house in five quarterly installments. Ram does not agree to it. Thereafter Shyam agrees to pay the price of the house in the way as originally desired by Ram. But Ram does not reply to it. Can Shyam compel Ram to sell his house to him?
A)
Shyam can compel Ram to sell his house because Shyam ultimately agrees to pay the price as originally desired by Ram
doneclear
B)
Shyam can compel Ram to sell his house because Shyam in the first instance substantially complied with the desire of Ram
doneclear
C)
Shyam can compel Ram to sell his house because Ram's offer does not exclude the payment of price in instalments
doneclear
D)
Shyam cannot compel Ram to sell his house because Shyam imposes a new condition about payment of price of the house while accepting the offer which is not ultimately accepted by Ram
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle Generally an agreement without consideration is not valid. Therefore, in order to make a valid agreement, some consideration which may have some value in the eyes of law, is essentially required. Facts William has an old car of which he makes seldom use. He voluntarily enters into an agreement with Smith to sell this car for rupees ten thousand. Thereafter one Anson approaches William and offers to buy that car for rupees 1 lakh as the car was one which Anson has been searching for long. Now, William wants to cancel his agreement with Smith and refuses to deliver the car to him saying that consideration price for the car promised by Smith is negligible and therefore, agreement with him cannot be said to be valid one.
A)
William can cancel his agreement with Smith as the consideration involved in that is really inadequate
doneclear
B)
William cannot cancel his agreement with Smith as the sale of car for rupees ten thousand was voluntary and this price has some value in the eyes of law
doneclear
C)
William can cancel his agreement with Smith as he was ignorant about the value/price of the car for which it could be sold
doneclear
D)
William can cancel his agreement with Smith as he is entitled to get full market value/ price of his car
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle In order to be eligible to appear in the semester examination, a student is required to attend, under all circumstances, at least 70% of the total classes held in that semester as per University rules. Facts Anand, an economically poor but a very brilliant student of LLB final semester, while going to his university by cycle received some leg injuries in road accident. Consequently Anand could not attend his classes for one week as he was advised rest by his doctor for that period. Due to this absence from the university, Anand failed to have 70% attendance essential to appear in the examination and therefore, he was debarred from appearing in the examination by the university authorities. Anand challenges this decision in the court of law.
A)
Anand will succeed in the court of law as the accident was beyond his control
doneclear
B)
Anand will definitely get favour of the court on humanitarian ground as he comes from a economically poor family and may not afford to take readmission
doneclear
C)
Anand will not succeed as he could very easily fulfil eligibility criteria for appearing in the examination by being reasonably regular in the class throughout the semester
doneclear
D)
Anand will succeed as requirement of 70% attendance may be declared arbitrary and therefore, unreasonable by the court of law
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle A seller of goods cannot transfer better rights than he himself possesses in the goods sold to the buyer. Facts Komal leaves his watch by mistake on a seat in the park. Sonal finds that watch and immediately sells the same for good price to Monal who without inquiring whether Sonal is its owner or not. Komal later on claims that watch from Monal decide whether Komal can succeed.
A)
Komal cannot succeed as Monal has paid good price of the watch
doneclear
B)
Komal cannot succeed as Monal is unaware of the fact that Sonal is not its owner
doneclear
C)
Komal cannot succeed as it was his carelessness and nothing else which enabled Sonal to sell the watch to Monal
doneclear
D)
Komal cannot succeed as Sonal is merely finder of the watch and therefore, cannot transfer ownership rights thereon to Monal
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle All citizens shall have the Fundamental Right to carry on any occupation, trade or business. But reasonable restrictions on the exercise of such rights can be imposed by law in the interest of the general public. Facts A large number of persons had been carrying on the business of dyeing and printing in Rajkot area for the last 25yer providing employment to about 30000 families. From these business places untreated dirty water was being discharged on the roads thereby causing damage to the public health. A notice, therefore, was given to close this business till necessary measures to protect public health as provided under the environmental statutes were taken by those businessmen.
A)
Notice cannot be justified as it will cause loss of employment to 30000 families
doneclear
B)
Notice cannot be justified as it amounts to violation of the Fundamental Right of the persons who have been carrying on the business for the last 25yer
doneclear
C)
The notice cannot be justified on the ground of damage to public health as the persons in that area have been voluntarily residing for long and have become used to that environment
doneclear
D)
The notice can be justified as the right to business is not absolute and reasonable restriction can be imposed by law in the interest of the public
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle A contract cannot be enforced by or against a person who is not a party to it. However, where some benefit is conferred on third party by the contract itself, there third party can be allowed to enforce that contract to get such benefit. Facts Dinesh is liable to pay Rs 50000 to Suresh. In order to discharge this liability Dinesh enters into a contract with Ramesh by which Dinesh sells his car to Ramesh for Rs 1 lakh Ramesh takes the delivery of the car and promises assures to pay its price at the earliest. Dinesh separately informs Suresh about this contract for his satisfaction. Ramesh fails to pay the car's price. Suresh wants to join Dinesh in filing suit against Ramesh for the recovery of price of the car. Whether Suresh is entitled to do so?
A)
Suresh is entitled to do so because the contract was made for his benefit
doneclear
B)
Suresh is entitled to do so because Dinesh is liable to him and discharge of this liability depends upon the payment of the price of the car by Ramesh
doneclear
C)
Suresh is not entitled to do so because liability of Dinesh does not depend upon any assurance of Ramesh
doneclear
D)
Suresh is not entitled to do so because he is not a party to the contract between Dinesh and Ramesh
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle If a contract is made by post between two persons living in two different cities, then the contract is said to be complete as soon as the letter of acceptance is properly posted and the place of completion of the contract is that city where acceptance is posted. It is worth mentioning here that in every contract there is always an offer from one party and the acceptance of the offer from the other party. Facts Sani, a resident of Patna, gives an offer by post to sell his house for Rs 25 lakh to Hani, a resident of Allahabad. This offer letter is posted on 1st January, 2013 from Patna and reaches Allahabad on 7th January, 2013. Hani accepts this offer and posts the letter of acceptance on 8th January, 2013 from Allahabad which reaches Patna on 16th January, 2013. But Sani presuming that Hani is not interested in accepting his offer, sells his house to Gani at same price on 15th of January, 2013. Hani files a suit against Sani for the breach of contract in the competent court of Allahabad. Whether Hani will succeed?
A)
Hani cannot succeed as Sani cannot be compelled by law to wait for the answer from Hani for an indefinite period of time
doneclear
B)
Hani cannot succeed as he could use some other effective and speedy mode for communicating his acceptance in minimum possible time
doneclear
C)
Hani can succeed as he properly posted the letter of acceptance and the delay was beyond his control
doneclear
D)
Hani can succeed as contract became complete in the eyes of law on the date of posting the letter of acceptance
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle He, who goes to the court of law to seek justice, must come with clean hands. Facts P enters into a contract with S under which S has to construct a house for P and has to complete the same within one year from the date of the contract. This contract includes two very important terms. According to first term, if there is price hike of the materials to be used in the construction, then the escalation charges at a particular rate shall be payable by P to S. According to second term, if the construction of the house is not completed within the period prescribed for it, then S will have to pay penalty at a particular rate to P. Before the completion of the construction work the workers of S go on strike and strike continues up to three months even after the expiry of one year. After that period workers return d the construction work again starts. During the last three months period of strike there was a considerable rise in the price of the building material. S claimed escalation cost from P, P did not agree to it. S filed a suit in the court of law either to order the payment of the price of the building material on the basis of escalated price or to allow him to stop the work without incurring any penal liability towards P.
A)
S will succeed as strike by his workers was unexpected and beyond his control
doneclear
B)
S can succeed as there is an escalation clause in the contract
doneclear
C)
S cannot succeed as he has failed to complete the construction work in time and strike cannot be treated as a valid excuse for delay in work
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle If the object of an agreement is or becomes unlawful or immoral or opposed to public policy in the eyes of law, then the courts will not enforce such agreements. Law generally prohibits child labour. Facts P enters into an agreement with T, by which P has to let his house to T for two years and T has to pay Rs 20000.00 per month to P as rent. T starts a child care centre in that house. But after some time in order to earn some money for the maintenance of the centre, T starts sending the children of the centre on the rotation basis to work for four hour a day in some nearby chemical and hazardous factories. When P comes to know about this new development, he asks T either to stop the children from working in factories or to leave his house immediately. T neither agrees to leave the house nor to stop the children from working in the factories. P files a suit in the court of law for appropriate relief action.
A)
P cannot succeed as the agreement was for the two years and it cannot be terminated before the expiry of that period.
doneclear
B)
P cannot succeed as the object at the time of making of the agreement was not clear
doneclear
C)
P will succeed as the object of the agreement has become unlawful
doneclear
D)
P will not succeed, if T agrees to share the wages of the children with P
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle Whosoever by his act or omission causes environmental pollution shall be held liable for .any loss caused by such pollution. It shall be no defence in such cases that all due diligence or reasonable care was taken while carrying out the act or omission in question. Facts Hari is carrying on a chemical and fertilizer industry near a bank of a river. In order to prevent and control any kind of harm to the environment, suitable waste treatment and disposal plants were installed in the factory. Due to some sudden mechanical technical problem, these plants ceased to work properly and therefore, caused environmental pollution, which ultimately caused substantial harm to the environment and to the people living around the factory. Victims of such pollution file a suit for suitable remedy.
A)
Victims cannot succeed as necessary precautions to prevent any harm were taken by Hari
doneclear
B)
Victims cannot succeed as the mechanical/technical problem was sudden and therefore, beyond the control of Hari
doneclear
C)
Victims can succeed as it is the duty of Hari to see that no harm is caused to the environment/people due to his activity under any circumstances
doneclear
D)
Victims could succeed, if treatment/disposal plant were not installed in the factory
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle If a person transfers movable or immovable property with its full ownership and without any consideration to some other person, then it is called a gift. Facts S, who has no child of his own, makes a gift of his house worth Rs 25 lakh to his nephew R. After completing all the legal formalities required for a valid gift, S says to R that in case of need R will provide that house to S for use without any questions. R does not react to it. After one year of this gift, S really needs that house and request R to make the house available to him, but R refuses to do so.
A)
R cannot refuse as he got the house without paying any consideration for that
doneclear
B)
R cannot refuse as S is without children
doneclear
C)
R can refuse as he has become full owner of the house
doneclear
D)
R can refuse as he himself may be in need of that house
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle An agreement to do an act impossible in itself cannot be enforced by a court of law. Facts Ramesh agrees with his girlfriend Shilpa to pluck stars from the sky through his extraordinary will power and bring them down on Earth for her within a week. After the expiry of one week, Shilpa filed a suit for damages against Ramesh, for the breach of contract as Ramesh failed to perform his promise.
A)
Shilpa can succeed in getting damages as Ramesh has deceived her
doneclear
B)
Ramesh cannot be held liable as he honestly believes that his love for Shilpa is true and therefore, he will succeed in his endeavour
doneclear
C)
The court cannot entertain such suits as the act promised under the agreement is impossible in It self
doneclear
D)
Ramesh can be held liable for making an absurd promise
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle An agreement may be oral or written. However, if a law specifically requires that an agreement must be in writing, then the agreement must be in writing. A law specifically requires that the agreements relating to transfer of the copyright in novel between an author of a novel and the producer of a motion picture must be in writing. Facts The author of a novel, Love at Lost Sight, had several rounds of discussion with a producer of motion picture regarding making of a motion picture based on Love at Lost Sight. During the last discussion, they decided to make a motion picture on Love at Lost Sight. The producer made a motion picture on Love at Lost Sight after making a payment of Rs 1000000 (ten Lakh only) in cash to the author, who happily accepted this amount as full and final payment. Later on, on the advice of his lawyer, the author brought a case in a court of law against the producer on the ground that there is no written agreement between the producer and him.
A)
The author is likely to succeed in the case as the agreement is not in accordance with the law
doneclear
B)
The author cannot succeed in the case as he has given his consent to the agreement
doneclear
C)
The author is not likely to succeed in the case because he has already accepted the amount of Rs 1000000 as full and final payment
doneclear
D)
The author can succeed in the case as the consideration is not adequate
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle A person is said to be of sound mind for the purpose of making a contract if, at the time, when he makes it, he is capable of understanding it and of forming a rational judgment as to its effect upon his interest. Facts X, who is usually of sound mind but occasionally of unsound mind enters into a contract with Y, when he (X) is of unsound mind. Y came to know about this fact afterwards and now wants to file a suit against X.
A)
X cannot enter into contract because he is of unsound mind, when he entered into contract
doneclear
B)
X can enter into contract but the burden is on the other party to prove that he was of unsound mind at the time of contract
doneclear
C)
X can enter into contract but the burden is on X to prove that he was of sound mind at the time of contract
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle Whosoever commits any act forbidden by the Indian Penal Code with a view to obtain the consent of any person to enter into an agreement, he cannot get the agreement enforced by law but the person, whose consent has been so obtained may get the agreement enforced by law. The Indian Penal Code defines various offences and prescribes punishments to there for. Facts A obtains the consent of B to enter into an agreement by an act amounting to criminal intimidation under the Indian Penal Code. A brings a case against B for performance of agreement
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle A contract between the father and his son is a contract of utmost good faith. In such a type of contract law presumes that at the time of entering into the contract the father was in a position to dominate the will of his son. Where one of the parties was in position to dominate the will of the other party, the contract is enforceable only at the option of the party whose will was so dominated. Facts Ram had advanced a sum of Rs 10000 to his minor son Shyam. When Shyam became major, his father Ram misused his parental position and entered into an agreement with Shyam and obtained a bond from him for a sum of Rs 30000 in respect of the advance. Whether this agreement is enforceable?
A)
The agreement is enforceable against Shyam only for Rs 10000, the actual amount of money advanced to him
doneclear
B)
The agreement is enforceable against Shyam for Rs 30000 because he has signed the bond
doneclear
C)
The agreement is enforceable against Shyam because he was major at the time of agreement
doneclear
D)
The agreement is not enforceable against Shyam because Ram has misused his position as father to obtain an unfair advantage
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle When at the desire of one person, any other person has done or abstained from doing something, such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration for the promise. Only a promise coupled with consideration is enforceable by law. Facts X, the uncle of Y, made a promise to pay him an amount of Rs 10000 as reward, if Y quits smoking and drinking within one year. X also deposited the above mentioned amount in a bank and informed Y that the said amount will be paid to him, if he quits smoking and drinking within one year. Within a period of six months of making the promise X died. After the expiry of one year of making the promise by X, Y made a request to the legal heirs of X demanding the promised money. The legal heirs of X declined the request of Y.
A)
The promise of X to Y is enforceable by law because Y has quitted smoking and drinking
doneclear
B)
The promise of X to Y is not enforceable by law because Y has benefitted by quitting smoking and drinking
doneclear
C)
The promise of X to Y is enforceable by law because the amount of Rs 10000 has been deposited in a bank
doneclear
D)
The promise of X to Y is enforceable by law because X has died within a period of six months of making the promise
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle 'Work' means literary work, artistic work, dramatic work, musical work, cinematographic film and sound recording but does not include acting in a cinematographic film. Only the works, as enumerated above, can be protected under copyright law. Facts A very famous actor acted in a cinematographic film. The actor was also the producer and director of cinematographic film.
A)
The acting of the actor can be protected under copyright law
doneclear
B)
The acting of the actor can be protected under copyright law only as an artistic work
doneclear
C)
The acting of the actor cannot be protected under copyright law
doneclear
D)
The acting of the actor cannot be protected under copyright law as a cinematographic film
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle In case where the government is a party, the government shall be the first owner of the copyright in the work unless there is an agreement to the contrary. Facts The Government of the State of X entered into an agreement with a retired professor of Botany. The professor agreed to write a text book on Botany. The government agreed to pay a sum of Rs 10 lakh to the professor for this work.
A)
The Government of the State of X shall be first owner of copyright in the text book
doneclear
B)
The professor shall be first owner of copyright in the text book
doneclear
C)
Both the Government of the State of X and the professor shall be the joint owners of copyright in the text book
doneclear
D)
The professor shall be first owner of copyright in the text book only, if he refuses to accept the amount of Rs 10 Lakh from the government
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle License is an agreement whereby the owner of the copyright agrees to grant an interest in the copyright to the licenses. Assignment is an agreement whereby the owner of the copyright transfers all the property rights to the assignee. Property right is a bundle of rights consisting of right to possess, right to use, right to alienate and the right to exclude others. Facts An owner of copyright in a cinematographic film enters into an agreement with B, a film distributor. B agrees to distribute the film only in Mumbai. A also enters into many such agreements with other distributors for distribution of his film in other cities.
A)
The agreement between A and B is more in the nature of assignment than in the nature of license
doneclear
B)
The agreement between A and B is more in the nature of license than in the nature of assignment
doneclear
C)
The agreement between A and B is both in the nature of assignment and license
doneclear
D)
The agreement between A and B is neither in the nature of assignment nor in the nature of license
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle Qui facit per alium facit per se, i.e., he who does things through others does it himself. Facts Nisha, the owner of a car, asked her friend Saurabh to take her car and drive the same to her office. As the car was near her office, it hit a pedestrian Srikant on account of Saurabh's negligent driving and injured him seriously. Now, Srikant files a suit for damages against Nisha.
A)
Nisha is not liable as it was the negligence of Saurabh
doneclear
B)
Saurabh is solely liable as Nisha was not driving the car
doneclear
C)
Nisha is liable as Saurabh was driving under her authority and for her purpose
doneclear
D)
Saurabh will be exempted from liability under the principle of inevitable accident
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle Words describing quality of things cannot be registered as trade mark. However, such words may be registered as trade mark, if they acquire a secondary meaning. Words acquire secondary meaning when people start associating the descriptive words with a person specific. Facts A hatchery located in Raipur is owned by X. X has been using the slogan 'new laid eggs sold here, since 1970 to describe the quality of eggs sold in his hatchery. Over a period of time because of continuous use of this slogan, people started associating this slogan with X. X filed an application for registration of the words 'new laid eggs' as trade mark in the year 1970.
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle Whoever takes away anything from the land of any person without that person's consent is said to commit theft. A thing so long as it is attached to the earth is not the subject of theft but it becomes capable of being the subject of theft as soon as it is severed from the Earth. Facts Y cuts down a tree standing on the land of X with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of X's possession without the consent of X. But Y is yet to take away the tree out of X's possession.
A)
Y has committed theft as soon as he came to the land of X
doneclear
B)
Y has committed theft as soon as the tree has been completely cut down by him
doneclear
C)
Y has committed theft as soon as he has started cutting down the tree
doneclear
D)
Y has not committed theft because he is yet to take away the tree out of X's possession
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle Res ipsa loquiturie i. e., the thing speaks for itself. Facts Seema got herself operated for the removal other uterus in the defendant's hospital, as there was diagnosed to be a cyst in one other ovaries. Due the negligence of the surgeon, who performed the operation, abdominal pack was left in her abdomen. The same was removed by a second surgery.
A)
Surgeon cannot be held responsible because it is merely a human error
doneclear
B)
Surgeon can be held responsible but Seema will have to prove in the court of law that the surgeon was grossly negligent
doneclear
C)
Surgeon will be responsible and Seema need not to prove surgeon's negligence because presence of abdominal pack in her abdomen is sufficient proof there for
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle Whoever takes away with him any minor person less than sixteen years of age, if a male or less than eighteen years of age, if a female out of the keeping of parents of such minor person without the consent of such parent, is said to kidnap such minor person. Facts A female born on January 01,1995 got admitted to an undergraduate program of a reputed university on July 01, 2012. She became friendly with one of the boys, born on June 01,1994, of her class. The boy and the girl decided to marry. The parents of the boy agreed but the family of the girl did not agree. On December 15, 2012 the girl made a call from her Blackberry to the boy. The girl told the boy to come in his car at a particular place and time. The boy reached the stipulated place before the stipulated time. He waited there for about half an hour. The girl reached the stipulated place. She opened the door of the car and sat beside the boy who was on the driving seat. Without exchanging any pleasantries, the boy drove the car to an unknown place. The father of the girl lodged an FIR in the nearest police station on January 20, 2013.
A)
The boy has committed the offence of kidnapping
doneclear
B)
The boy has not committed the offence of kidnapping
doneclear
C)
The boy has not committed the offence of kidnapping for there is a delay in filing the FIR
doneclear
D)
The boy has not committed the offence of kidnapping because the girl was his classmate
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal shall be punished. Facts Two adult men were found engaged in carnal intercourse by the police. The police arrested the men and produced them before the court.
A)
Court will punish the police officer who arrested the men
doneclear
B)
Court will not punish the men for they were adults
doneclear
C)
Court will punish the men
doneclear
D)
Court may be requested to declare the law unconstitutional
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle Wherever the causing of a certain effect or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence. Facts A intentionally omitted to give food to his father. He also used to beat his father. Consequently A's father died.
A)
A did not commit any offence
doneclear
B)
A committed only the offence of omitting to give food to his father
doneclear
C)
A committed only the offence of beating of his father
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle Nothing is an offence which is done by a child under seven years of age.
Facts A child born on January 01, 2005 killed another child B on December 30, 2011.
A)
A has committed no offence
doneclear
B)
A has committed the offence as it is heinous crime
doneclear
C)
Killing of one child by another child is not an offence
doneclear
D)
A has not committed the offence for on the date of killing of B, A was a minor
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle A pact, other than a pact to commit suicide, to suffer any harm is not an offence, provided the age of the person who has given his consent to suffer harm is above eighteen years. Facts A enters into a pact with B, a boy of less than 18yer of age, to fence with each other for amusement. They agreed to suffer any harm which, in the course of such fencing, may be caused without foul play.
A)
A, while playing fairly, hurts B, A commits no offence
doneclear
B)
A, while playing only unfairly, hurts B, A commits an offence
doneclear
C)
A, while playing fairly, hurts B, A commits an offence
doneclear
D)
A, while playing unfairly, hurts B, A commits no offence
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle When an act, which would otherwise be an offence, is not that offence by reason of the youth, the want of maturity of understanding, the unsoundness of mind or the intoxication of the person doing that act, every person has the same right of private defence against, that act, which he would have if the act were that offence. Nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of the right of private defence. Facts A under the influence of madness, attempts to kill B. B in order to save his life causes grievous hurt to A.
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle Mere silence as to facts likely to affect the decision of a person to enter into a contract does not amount to fraud, unless his silence is in itself equivalent to speech. Facts A sells to B a horse which A knows to be of unsound mind. B says to A that if A does not say anything about the state of mind of horse, then B shall presume that the horse is of sound mind. A says nothing to B about the mental condition of horse.
A)
A has committed fraud
doneclear
B)
A has committed misrepresentation
doneclear
C)
There cannot be a fraud because A says nothing about the mental condition of the horse
doneclear
D)
There cannot be a fraud because B did not ask A whether the horse is of sound mind
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle Whoever by words, either spoken or written brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards the government established by law in India shall be punished. However, comments expressing disapprobation of the administrative or other action of the government without exciting or attempting to excite hatred, contempt or disaffection, do not constitute an offence. Facts A renowned professor of Economics wrote a critical comment on the economic policies of the Government of India in a National Daily. This piece of writing generated academic debate not only in the print media but also on television and internet. A student of law asked the fellow Indians on a social networking website to assemble at a particular place for peaceful and silent demonstration against the said economic policies on a stipulated date and time. The crowd assembled at that venue and started shouting anti-government slogans. Police arrested the professor.
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle Where two or more persons have made a complaint for the grant of compulsory license to the copyright board, the license shall be granted to that complainant only who, in the opinion of the copyright board, would best serve the interests of the general public. Facts Four persons made a complaint for the grant of compulsory license to the copyright board.
A)
License shall be granted to only one complainant
doneclear
B)
License may be granted to two complainants
doneclear
C)
License may be granted to three complainants
doneclear
D)
License must be granted to all the four complainants
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle Any police officer, not below the rank of a Sub-Inspector, may, if he is satisfied that an offence in respect of the infringement of copyright in any work has been, is being, or is likely to be, committed, seize without warrant, all copies of the work and all plates used for the purpose of making infringing copies of the work; wherever found and all copies and plates so seized shall, as soon as practicable, be produced before a Magistrate. Facts A Superintendent of Police (SP) conducted a raid on a shop and found pirated copies of books. The SP formed an opinion that infringement of copyright is taking place. He arrested the shop owner without warrant in the light of above mentioned propositions.
A)
The arrest of the shop owner was within the power of the SP
doneclear
B)
The arrest of the shop owner was not within the power of the SP
doneclear
C)
The shop owner can never be arrested
doneclear
D)
SP was not competent to know whether infringement of copyright has taken place
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle Whoever attempts to commit an offence punishable by the Indian Penal Code and in such attempt does any act towards the commission of the offence, shall be punished. Stealing is an offence punishable by the Indian Penal Code. Facts A makes an attempt to steal some jewels by breaking open a box and after so opening the box, finds that there is no jewel in it.
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle Whoever by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes any imputation concerning any person intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is said to defame that person. Facts In a community there is a custom of stealing shoes of bridegroom during the marriage ceremony. The shoes of the bridegroom were stolen by Y, A announced that Z has stolen the shoes. Everyone present in the marriage party started staring at Z with great surprise. Z felt very ashamed.
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle An employer is liable for the negligence of his employee. But an employer is not liable for the negligence of his employee, if the victim of such negligence is one of his other employees. Facts A and B were working in a factory as unskilled labourers. A was carrying a basket of stones on his head. B was sitting on the ground. When A crossed B, all of a sudden a stone fell down from the basket and hit B on his head. B died immediately.
A)
The owner of the factory will be liable
doneclear
B)
A and the owner of the factory shall be jointly liable
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle Damages are the money recompense, as far as money can do, for the violation of a right, Facts A, an Indian citizen, having a right to vote, was not allowed to cast his vote on the polling booth, by the returning officer. Name of A was mentioned in the voter's list. A has also reported at the polling booth in time. However, the candidate in whose favour A would have cast his vote won the election. A filed a suit claiming damages.
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle When a party to a contract has refused to perform, or disabled himself from performing, his promise in its entirety, the other party may put an end to the contract. Facts A engaged B on April 12 to enter his service on June 1 but on May 11, A wrote to B that his services would not be needed. On May 22, B joined C for employment. 3
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle When a person voluntarily agrees to suffer some harm, he is not allowed to complain for that. Facts A was one of the spectators at a formula one car race, being held at Gurgaon, on a track owned by one M company. During the race, there was a collision between two racing cars, one of which was thrown away amidst spectators, thereby causing an injury to A, A claims damages for the injuries caused to him.
A)
M company will be liable for damages because the injury was caused during the race organized by it
doneclear
B)
M company will not be liable for damages because A had come to see the race on his own will
doneclear
C)
M company will not be liable for damages because the collision between the cars was beyond its control
doneclear
D)
M company will be liable because it has earned huge revenue by way of sale of tickets for the event
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle An interest which is created on a transfer of property and depends upon the fulfilment of a condition will fail, if the fulfillment of the condition is impossible or is forbidden by law or is of such a nature that, if permitted, it would defeat the provisions of any law or is fraudulent or involves or implies injury to the person or property of another or the court regards it as immoral or opposed to public policy.- Facts, A gives Rs 10 lakh to B on condition that B shall marry A's daughter C. On the date on which A gave Rs 10 lakh to B, C was dead.
A)
B's interest in Rs 10 lakh fails because of impossibility
doneclear
B)
B's interest in Rs 10 lakh fails because of immorality
doneclear
C)
B's interest in Rs 10 lakh fails because of prohibition by law
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle A condition precedent must be complied with before the happening of the event to which such a condition is attached. Fulfilment of such a condition after the happening of the event is no fulfilment of condition. Facts A transfers Rs 5000 to B on condition that he shall marry with the consent of C, D and E. As C, D and E had to go abroad for some business purposes and as the date of marriage was already fixed, therefore, B marries without the consent of C, D and E but obtains their consent after the marriage when C, D and E return to their country.
A)
B has fulfilled the condition
doneclear
B)
B has not fulfilled the condition
doneclear
C)
B was free to marry any one without the consent of any body
doneclear
D)
B must divorce his wife as he married her without fulfilling the condition
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle In an agreement, a condition subsequent must be complied with, to claim the benefit of that agreement. Facts A agrees to transfer a farm to B, provided that, if B does not go to England within three years after the date of the agreement, his interest in the farm shall cease. B does not go to England within the term prescribed.
A)
B's interest in the farm continues
doneclear
B)
B's interest in the farm does not continue
doneclear
C)
B has a fundamental right to go to England or not to go to England and hence the condition was illegal
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle Existence of all the alleged facts is relevant whether they occurred at the same time and place or at different times and places. Facts A, a permanent resident in a foreign country who never visited India, is accused of waging war against the Government of India by taking part in an armed insurrection in which property is destroyed, troops are attacked and prisons are broken open.
A)
The existence of oil the above mentioned alleged facts is relevant
doneclear
B)
Only the alleged fact that A is accused of waging war against the Government of India is relevant
doneclear
C)
The fact that A was a permanent resident in a foreign country who never visited India is not relevant
doneclear
D)
Only the alleged fact of taking part by A in armed insurrection is relevant
Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
Principle Whoever desires any court to give judgment about any legal right or liability which depends on the existence of those facts which he asserts, must prove that those facts exist. Facts A asserts that B, C and D have committed an offence of criminal conspiracy and therefore A desires a Court to give judgment that B, C and D shall be punished for that crime which A says B, C and D have committed.
A)
A must prove that B, C and D have committed the crime
doneclear
B)
B, C and D must prove that they have not committed the crime
doneclear
C)
A must prove that B, C and D were present at the place of crime
doneclear
D)
Police must prove that B, C and D have committed the crime
question_answer196) Principle The fact that any person was born during the continuance of a valid marriage between his mother and any man, or within two hundred and eighty days after its dissolution, the mother remaining unmarried, shall be conclusive proof that he is the legitimate son of that man, unless it can be shown that the parties to the marriage had no access to each other at any time when he could have been begotten. Facts X and Y married on January 15, 1995. Y, the wife of X, never left her parental home and never went to her husband's home. A boy was born to Y on July 15, 1995. For the court
A)
there shall be a conclusive proof that the boy is the legitimate son of X
doneclear
B)
there shall be no conclusive proof that the boy is the legitimate son of X
doneclear
C)
there shall be a conclusive proof that the boy is the illegitimate son of X
question_answer197) Principle An unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it, is a nuisance in law of tort. Facts During the scarcity of onions, long queues were made outside the defendant' shop who having a license to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg of onion per ration card. The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers filed a suit for nuisance against the defendant. Which one of the following decisions will be correct in this suit?
A)
The defendant is liable for nuisance
doneclear
B)
The defendant is not liable for nuisance
doneclear
C)
The defendant is liable under the principle of strict liability
doneclear
D)
The plaintiff's suit should be decreed in favour of the neighbouring shopkeeper
question_answer198) Principle Every agreement in restraint of the marriage of any person, other than a minor, is void. Facts Qadir Khan died in a road accident. Two co-widows. Sultana and Marjina enter into an agreement that if any of them will remarry, would forfeit her right to her share in the deceased husband's property.
A)
The agreement is void because it was restraint of marriage
doneclear
B)
The agreement is not void because no restraint was imposed upon either of two widows for remarriage
question_answer199) Principle Nothing is an offence merely by reason of its being done with the knowledge that it is likely to cause harm, if it be done without any criminal intention to cause harm and in good faith for the purpose of preventing or avoiding other harm to a person or property. Facts Mr Sharman, the Italian captain of a steam vessel, suddenly and without any fault or negligence on his part, finds himself near the Kochi coast in such a position that before he can stop his vessel, he must inevitably run down a boat B with twenty or thirty passengers on board, unless he changes the course of his vessel, and that by changing his course, he must incur risk of running down a boat C with only two passengers on board, which he may possibly clear. Whether Sharman has committed an offence?
A)
Sharman has committed no offence because this was done out of necessity
doneclear
B)
Sharman can be held responsible for the act of criminal negligence
doneclear
C)
Sharman can be held responsible for culpable homicide
doneclear
D)
This is a clear case of accident so Sharman cannot be held responsible
question_answer200) Principle Only the Parliament or the State Legislatures have the authority to enact laws on their own. No law made by State can take away a person's fundamental right. Facts Parliament enacted a law, which according to a group of lawyers is violating the Fundamental Rights of traders. The group of lawyers filed a writ petition against the Parliament for enacting such law and requests the court to quash the law and to direct the Parliament to make a new law.
A)
No writ would lie against the Parliament, as the Court has no authority to direct the Parliament to enact or re-enact a taw
doneclear
B)
The Court can quash the existing law, if it violates fundamental right and can direct to make a new law
doneclear
C)
The Court can quash the existing law, if it violates fundamental right but cannot direct the Parliament to make a new law