| Consider the following statements. |
| 1. The High Court issue writs only for the purpose of enforcement of Fundamental Rights whereas the |
| Supreme Court can issue writs for the purpose of enforcement of Fundamental Rights and also for any other purpose. |
| 2. High Courts can issue writs of jurisdiction whereas the Supreme Court cannot issue the writ of jurisdiction. |
| 3. High Courts issue writs only when the party directly approaches it, whereas the Supreme Court car issue writs necessarily by way of appeal. |
| Which of the statements) given above is/are correct? |
A) Only 3
B) 1, 2 and 3
C) 1 and 3
D) None of these
Correct Answer: D
Solution :
[d]| Statement 1 is incorrect High Court to issue writs for the enforcement of the Fundamental Rights and ordinar right, whereas the Supreme Court can issue writs for enforcement Fundamental Rights only. |
| Statement 2 is also incorrect because High Court as well as Supreme Court both can issue writs of jurisdiction. |
| Statement 3 is also incorrect Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in the sense that an aggrieved citizen can directly go the Supreme Court, not necessarily by way of appeal. |
You need to login to perform this action.
You will be redirected in
3 sec