| Direction: in the question, there are five sentences. Each sentence has pairs of words/phrases that are italicized and highlighted. From the italicized and highlighted word (s)/phrase (s), select the most appropriate word (s)/phrase(s) to form correct sentences. Then, from the options given. Choose the best one. |
| The further [A] further [B] he pushed himself, the more disillusioned he grew. |
| For the crowd it was more of a historical [A]/ historic [B] event; for their leader it was just another day. |
| The old has a healthy distrust [A]/mistrust [B] for all new technology. |
| The film is based on a worthy [A]/true [B] story. |
| She coughed discreetly [A]/discretely [B] to announce her presence. |
| Direction: in the question, there are five sentences. Each sentence has pairs of words/phrases that are italicized and highlighted. From the italicized and highlighted word (s)/phrase (s), select the most appropriate word (s)/phrase(s) to form correct sentences. Then, from the options given. Choose the best one. |
| Regrettably [A]/Regretfully [B] I have to decline your invitation. The critics censored [A]/censured [B] the new movie because of its social unacceptably. |
| He was beside [A]/beside [B] himself with range when I told him what I had done |
| Anita had a beautiful broach [A] brooch [B] on the lapel of her jacket. |
| He has the same capacity as an adult to consent [A]/assent [B] to surgical treatment |
| Direction: in the question, there are five sentences. Each sentence has pairs of words/phrases that are italicized and highlighted. From the italicized and highlighted word (s)/phrase (s), select the most appropriate word (s)/phrase(s) to form correct sentences. Then, from the options given. Choose the best one. |
| The prisoner's interment [A]/interment [B] come to an end with his early release. |
| She managed to bite back the ironic [A]/ caustic [B] retort on the tip of her tongue. |
| Jeans that flair [A]/flare [B] at the bottom are in fashion these days. |
| The heard the bells peeling [A]/pealing [B] far and wide. |
| The students baited [A]/bated [B] the instructor with irrelevant questions. |
| Direction for the question: Identify the incorrect sentence/sentences. |
| [A] I want to do an MBA before going into business. |
| [B] Priti's husband has been on active service for three months. |
| [C] The horse suddenly broke into a buckle. |
| [D] I need to file an insurance claim. |
| Direction for the question: Identify the incorrect sentence/sentences. |
| [A] I must run fast to catch up with him |
| [B] The newly released book is enjoying a popular run. |
| [C] The doctor is on a hospital round. |
| [D] You can't run over him like that. |
| Direction for the question: Identify the incorrect sentence/sentences. |
| [A] The letter was posted to the address |
| [B)] Your stand is beyond all reasons. |
| [C] How do you deal with friend who doesn't listen to a reason? |
| [D] My wife runs profitable business in this suburb. |
| Direction: Fill up blanks, numbered |1||2||3||4||5| and |6|in the passage given most appropriate word from the options given for each blank. |
| "Between the year 1946 and the year 1995. I did not file any income tax returns.' With that |1| statement. Soubhik embarked on an account of his encounter with the Income Tax Department. 'I originally owed Rs 20,000 in unpaid taxes. With |2| and [3|, the 20,000 become 60000 The Income Tax Department then went into action and I learned first-hand just how much power the Tax Department wields. Royalties' can trust funds can be |4| automobiles may be |5|, and auctioned off. Nothing belongs to the |6|until the case is settled. |
| Direction: Fill up blanks, numbered |1||2||3||4||5| and |6|in the passage given most appropriate word from the options given for each blank. |
| "Between the year 1946 and the year 1995. I did not file any income tax returns.' With that |1| statement. Soubhik embarked on an account of his encounter with the Income Tax Department. 'I originally owed Rs 20,000 in unpaid taxes. With |2| and [3|, the 20,000 become 60000 The Income Tax Department then went into action and I learned first-hand just how much power the Tax Department wields. Royalties' can trust funds can be |4| automobiles may be |5|, and auctioned off. Nothing belongs to the |6|until the case is settled. |
| Direction: Fill up blanks, numbered |1||2||3||4||5| and |6|in the passage given most appropriate word from the options given for each blank. |
| "Between the year 1946 and the year 1995. I did not file any income tax returns.' With that |1| statement. Soubhik embarked on an account of his encounter with the Income Tax Department. 'I originally owed Rs 20,000 in unpaid taxes. With |2| and [3|, the 20,000 become 60000 The Income Tax Department then went into action and I learned first-hand just how much power the Tax Department wields. Royalties' can trust funds can be |4| automobiles may be |5|, and auctioned off. Nothing belongs to the |6|until the case is settled. |
| Direction: Fill up blanks, numbered |1||2||3||4||5| and |6|in the passage given most appropriate word from the options given for each blank. |
| "Between the year 1946 and the year 1995. I did not file any income tax returns.' With that |1| statement. Soubhik embarked on an account of his encounter with the Income Tax Department. 'I originally owed Rs 20,000 in unpaid taxes. With |2| and [3|, the 20,000 become 60000 The Income Tax Department then went into action and I learned first-hand just how much power the Tax Department wields. Royalties' can trust funds can be |4| automobiles may be |5|, and auctioned off. Nothing belongs to the |6|until the case is settled. |
| Direction: Fill up blanks, numbered |1||2||3||4||5| and |6|in the passage given most appropriate word from the options given for each blank. |
| "Between the year 1946 and the year 1995. I did not file any income tax returns.' With that |1| statement. Soubhik embarked on an account of his encounter with the Income Tax Department. 'I originally owed Rs 20,000 in unpaid taxes. With |2| and [3|, the 20,000 become 60000 The Income Tax Department then went into action and I learned first-hand just how much power the Tax Department wields. Royalties' can trust funds can be |4| automobiles may be |5|, and auctioned off. Nothing belongs to the |6|until the case is settled. |
| Direction: Fill up blanks, numbered |1||2||3||4||5| and |6|in the passage given most appropriate word from the options given for each blank. |
| "Between the year 1946 and the year 1995. I did not file any income tax returns.' With that |1| statement. Soubhik embarked on an account of his encounter with the Income Tax Department. 'I originally owed Rs 20,000 in unpaid taxes. With |2| and [3|, the 20,000 become 60000 The Income Tax Department then went into action and I learned first-hand just how much power the Tax Department wields. Royalties' can trust funds can be |4| automobiles may be |5|, and auctioned off. Nothing belongs to the |6|until the case is settled. |
| Direction: Four alternative summaries are given the text. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the text. |
| Some decisions will be fairly obvious-"no- brainers'. Your bank account is low, but you have a two-week vacation coming up and you want to get away t some place warm to relax with your family. Will you accept your in laws' offer of free use of their Florida beach front condo? Sure. You like your employer and feel ready to move forward in your career. Will you step in for your boss for three weeks while she attends a professional development course? Of course. |
| [A] some decision are obvious under certain circumstances. You may, for example, readily accept a relative's offer of free holiday accommodation. Or step in for your boss when she is away. |
| [B] Some decisions are no-brainers. You need not think when making them Examples are condo offer from in-laws and job offers from bosses when your bank account is low or boss is away. |
| [C] Easy decisions are called 'no-brainers' because they do not require any cerebral activity. Examples such as accepting free holiday accommodation abound in our lives. |
| [D] Accepting an offer from in-laws when you are short O funds and want, a holiday is a no-brainer. Another no-brainer is taking the boss's job when she is an away. |
| Direction: Four alternative summaries are given the text. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the text. |
| Physically, inertia is a feeling that you just can't move; mentally, it is a sluggish mind. Even if you try to be sensitive, if your mind is sluggish, you just don't feel anything intensely. You may even see a tragedy enacted in front of your eyes and not be able to respond meaningfully. You may see one person exploiting another, one group persecuting another, and not be able to get angry. Your energy is frozen. You are not deliberately refusing to act; you just don't have the capacity. |
| [A] Inertia makes your body and mind sluggish. They become insensitive to tragedies, exploitation, and persecution because it freezes your energy and decapitates it. |
| [B] When you have inertia you don't act although you see one person exploiting another or one group persecuting another. You don't get angry because you are incapable. |
| [C] Inertia is of two types-physically and mental physically inertia restricts bodily movements. Mental inertia prevents response to events enacted in front of your eyes. |
| [D] Physically inertia stops your body from moving; mental inertia freezes your energy and stops your mind from responding meaningfully to events, even tragedies, in front of you. |
| Direction: For the word a contextual sentence is given. Pick the word from the alternatives given that is most inappropriate in the given context. |
| Direction: For the word a contextual sentence is given. Pick the word from the alternatives given that is most inappropriate in the given context. |
| Direction: For the word a contextual sentence is given. Pick the word from the alternatives given that is most inappropriate in the given context. |
| Direction: For the word a contextual sentence is given. Pick the word from the alternatives given that is most inappropriate in the given context. |
| Direction: For the word a contextual sentence is given. Pick the word from the alternatives given that is most inappropriate in the given context. |
| Direction: Answer the question based, on the following information. Indicate which of the statements given with that particular question consistent with the description of unreasonable man in the passage below. |
| Unreasonableness is a tendency to do socially permissible things at the wrong time. The unreasonable man is the sort of person who comes to confide in you when you are busy. He serenades his beloved when she is ill. He asks a man who has just lost money by paying a bill for a friend to pay to bill to him. He invites a friend to go for a ride just after the friend has finished a long car trip. He is eager to offer services which are not wanted, but which cannot be politely refused. If he is present at an arbitration, he stirs up dissension between the two parties who were really anxious to agree. Such is the unreasonable man |
| Direction: Answer the question based, on the following information. Indicate which of the statements given with that particular question consistent with the description of unreasonable man in the passage below. |
| Unreasonableness is a tendency to do socially permissible things at the wrong time. The unreasonable man is the sort of person who comes to confide in you when you are busy. He serenades his beloved when she is ill. He asks a man who has just lost money by paying a bill for a friend to pay to bill to him. He invites a friend to go for a ride just after the friend has finished a long car trip. He is eager to offer services which are not wanted, but which cannot be politely refused. If he is present at an arbitration, he stirs up dissension between the two parties who were really anxious to agree. Such is the unreasonable man |
| Direction: In the following sentence, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of paraphrasing the underlined part are indicated choose the best alternative among the four option. |
| Direction: In the following sentence, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of paraphrasing the underlined part are indicated choose the best alternative among the four option. |
| Direction: In the following sentence, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of paraphrasing the underlined part are indicated choose the best alternative among the four option. |
| Direction: In the question, a related pair of words or phrases in followed by a pair of words or phrases. Select the pair that best expresses a relationship similar to the one expressed in the original pair. |
| Direction: In the question, a related pair of words or phrases in followed by a pair of words or phrases. Select the pair that best expresses a relationship similar to the one expressed in the original pair. |
| Direction: In the question, a related pair of words or phrases in followed by a pair of words or phrases. Select the pair that best expresses a relationship similar to the one expressed in the original pair. |
| Direction: In view of the passage given below. Choose the best option for question. When talks come to how India has done for itself in 50 years of Independence, the world has nothing but praise for our success in remaining a democracy. On other front, the applause is less loud in absolute terms, India has not done too badly, of course, life expectancy has increased so has literacy. Industry, which was barely a fledging, has grown tremendously. And as far as agriculture is concerned, India has been transformed from a country perpetually on the edge of starvation into a success story held up for others to emulate. But these are competitive times when changes is rapid, and to walk slowly when the rest of the world is running is almost as bad as standing still on walking backwards. |
| Compared with large chunks of what was then the developing world South Korea. Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, China and what was till lately a separate Hong Kong-India has fared abysmally. It began with a far better infrastructure than most of these countries had It suffered hardly or not at all during the Second World War. It had advantage like an English speaking elite, quality scientific manpower (including a Nobel laureate and other who could be ranked among the world's best) and excellent business acumen. Yet, today, when countries are ranked according to their global competitiveness, it is tiny Singapore that figures at the top. Hong Kong is an export powerhouse, so is Taiwan. If a symbol were needed to how far we have fallen back, note that while Korean Cielos are sold in India, no one is South Korea is rushing to buy an Indian car. The reason list themselves. Topmost is economic isolationism. |
| The government discouraged imports and encouraged self-sufficiency. Whatever the aim was, the result was the creation of a totally inefficient industry that failed to keep pace with global trends and, therefore, became absolutely uncompetitive. Only when the trade gates were opened a little did this become apparent. The years since then have been spent in merely trying to catch up. That the government actually sheltered its industrialists from foreign competition is a little strange. For in all other respects, it operated under the conviction that businessmen were little more than crooks how were to be prevented from entering the most important areas of the economy, how were to be hamstrung is as many ways as possible, how were to be tolerated in the same way as an inexcusable wart. The high expropriator rates taxation, the licensing laws, the reservation of whole swathes of industry for the public sector, and the granting of monopolies to the public sector firms were the principle manifestations of this attitude. The government forgot that before wealth could be distributed, it had to be created. |
| The government forgot it itself could not create, but only squander wealth. Some of the manifestation of the old attitude have changed. Tax rates have fallen licensing has been all but abolished. And the gates of global trade have been opened wide. But most of these changes were first by circumstances partly by the foreign exchange bankruptcy of 1991 and the recognition that the government could no longer muster the funds of support the public sector, leave alone expand it. Whether the attitude of the government itself, or that of more than handful of ministers, has changed one with. Business still has to negotiate a welter of negotiations. Transparency is still a longer way off. And there is no exit policy. In defending the existing policy, politicians betray an inability to see beyond their noses. A no-exit policy for labor is equivalent to a no-entry policy for new business. If one industry is not allowed to retrench labor, other industries will think a hundred times before employing new labor. In other ways too, the government hurts industries. |
| Public sector monopolies like the department of telecommunication and Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. make it possible for India business to operate only at a cost several times that the their counterparts abroad. The infrastructure is in a shambles partly because it is unable to formulate a sufficiently remunerative policy for private business, and partly because it does not have the stomach to change market rates for services. After a burst of activity in the early nineties, the government is dragging its feet. At the rate it is going, it will be another fifty years before the government realizes that a pro-business policy is the best pro-people policy. By then a course, the world would have moved even farther ahead. |
| Direction: In view of the passage given below. Choose the best option for question. When talks come to how India has done for itself in 50 years of Independence, the world has nothing but praise for our success in remaining a democracy. On other front, the applause is less loud in absolute terms, India has not done too badly, of course, life expectancy has increased so has literacy. Industry, which was barely a fledging, has grown tremendously. And as far as agriculture is concerned, India has been transformed from a country perpetually on the edge of starvation into a success story held up for others to emulate. But these are competitive times when changes is rapid, and to walk slowly when the rest of the world is running is almost as bad as standing still on walking backwards. |
| Compared with large chunks of what was then the developing world South Korea. Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, China and what was till lately a separate Hong Kong-India has fared abysmally. It began with a far better infrastructure than most of these countries had It suffered hardly or not at all during the Second World War. It had advantage like an English speaking elite, quality scientific manpower (including a Nobel laureate and other who could be ranked among the world's best) and excellent business acumen. Yet, today, when countries are ranked according to their global competitiveness, it is tiny Singapore that figures at the top. Hong Kong is an export powerhouse, so is Taiwan. If a symbol were needed to how far we have fallen back, note that while Korean Cielos are sold in India, no one is South Korea is rushing to buy an Indian car. The reason list themselves. Topmost is economic isolationism. |
| The government discouraged imports and encouraged self-sufficiency. Whatever the aim was, the result was the creation of a totally inefficient industry that failed to keep pace with global trends and, therefore, became absolutely uncompetitive. Only when the trade gates were opened a little did this become apparent. The years since then have been spent in merely trying to catch up. That the government actually sheltered its industrialists from foreign competition is a little strange. For in all other respects, it operated under the conviction that businessmen were little more than crooks how were to be prevented from entering the most important areas of the economy, how were to be hamstrung is as many ways as possible, how were to be tolerated in the same way as an inexcusable wart. The high expropriator rates taxation, the licensing laws, the reservation of whole swathes of industry for the public sector, and the granting of monopolies to the public sector firms were the principle manifestations of this attitude. The government forgot that before wealth could be distributed, it had to be created. |
| The government forgot it itself could not create, but only squander wealth. Some of the manifestation of the old attitude have changed. Tax rates have fallen licensing has been all but abolished. And the gates of global trade have been opened wide. But most of these changes were first by circumstances partly by the foreign exchange bankruptcy of 1991 and the recognition that the government could no longer muster the funds of support the public sector, leave alone expand it. Whether the attitude of the government itself, or that of more than handful of ministers, has changed one with. Business still has to negotiate a welter of negotiations. Transparency is still a longer way off. And there is no exit policy. In defending the existing policy, politicians betray an inability to see beyond their noses. A no-exit policy for labor is equivalent to a no-entry policy for new business. If one industry is not allowed to retrench labor, other industries will think a hundred times before employing new labor. In other ways too, the government hurts industries. |
| Public sector monopolies like the department of telecommunication and Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. make it possible for India business to operate only at a cost several times that the their counterparts abroad. The infrastructure is in a shambles partly because it is unable to formulate a sufficiently remunerative policy for private business, and partly because it does not have the stomach to change market rates for services. After a burst of activity in the early nineties, the government is dragging its feet. At the rate it is going, it will be another fifty years before the government realizes that a pro-business policy is the best pro-people policy. By then a course, the world would have moved even farther ahead. |
| Direction: In view of the passage given below. Choose the best option for question. When talks come to how India has done for itself in 50 years of Independence, the world has nothing but praise for our success in remaining a democracy. On other front, the applause is less loud in absolute terms, India has not done too badly, of course, life expectancy has increased so has literacy. Industry, which was barely a fledging, has grown tremendously. And as far as agriculture is concerned, India has been transformed from a country perpetually on the edge of starvation into a success story held up for others to emulate. But these are competitive times when changes is rapid, and to walk slowly when the rest of the world is running is almost as bad as standing still on walking backwards. |
| Compared with large chunks of what was then the developing world South Korea. Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, China and what was till lately a separate Hong Kong-India has fared abysmally. It began with a far better infrastructure than most of these countries had It suffered hardly or not at all during the Second World War. It had advantage like an English speaking elite, quality scientific manpower (including a Nobel laureate and other who could be ranked among the world's best) and excellent business acumen. Yet, today, when countries are ranked according to their global competitiveness, it is tiny Singapore that figures at the top. Hong Kong is an export powerhouse, so is Taiwan. If a symbol were needed to how far we have fallen back, note that while Korean Cielos are sold in India, no one is South Korea is rushing to buy an Indian car. The reason list themselves. Topmost is economic isolationism. |
| The government discouraged imports and encouraged self-sufficiency. Whatever the aim was, the result was the creation of a totally inefficient industry that failed to keep pace with global trends and, therefore, became absolutely uncompetitive. Only when the trade gates were opened a little did this become apparent. The years since then have been spent in merely trying to catch up. That the government actually sheltered its industrialists from foreign competition is a little strange. For in all other respects, it operated under the conviction that businessmen were little more than crooks how were to be prevented from entering the most important areas of the economy, how were to be hamstrung is as many ways as possible, how were to be tolerated in the same way as an inexcusable wart. The high expropriator rates taxation, the licensing laws, the reservation of whole swathes of industry for the public sector, and the granting of monopolies to the public sector firms were the principle manifestations of this attitude. The government forgot that before wealth could be distributed, it had to be created. |
| The government forgot it itself could not create, but only squander wealth. Some of the manifestation of the old attitude have changed. Tax rates have fallen licensing has been all but abolished. And the gates of global trade have been opened wide. But most of these changes were first by circumstances partly by the foreign exchange bankruptcy of 1991 and the recognition that the government could no longer muster the funds of support the public sector, leave alone expand it. Whether the attitude of the government itself, or that of more than handful of ministers, has changed one with. Business still has to negotiate a welter of negotiations. Transparency is still a longer way off. And there is no exit policy. In defending the existing policy, politicians betray an inability to see beyond their noses. A no-exit policy for labor is equivalent to a no-entry policy for new business. If one industry is not allowed to retrench labor, other industries will think a hundred times before employing new labor. In other ways too, the government hurts industries. |
| Public sector monopolies like the department of telecommunication and Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. make it possible for India business to operate only at a cost several times that the their counterparts abroad. The infrastructure is in a shambles partly because it is unable to formulate a sufficiently remunerative policy for private business, and partly because it does not have the stomach to change market rates for services. After a burst of activity in the early nineties, the government is dragging its feet. At the rate it is going, it will be another fifty years before the government realizes that a pro-business policy is the best pro-people policy. By then a course, the world would have moved even farther ahead. |
| Direction: In view of the passage given below. Choose the best option for question. When talks come to how India has done for itself in 50 years of Independence, the world has nothing but praise for our success in remaining a democracy. On other front, the applause is less loud in absolute terms, India has not done too badly, of course, life expectancy has increased so has literacy. Industry, which was barely a fledging, has grown tremendously. And as far as agriculture is concerned, India has been transformed from a country perpetually on the edge of starvation into a success story held up for others to emulate. But these are competitive times when changes is rapid, and to walk slowly when the rest of the world is running is almost as bad as standing still on walking backwards. |
| Compared with large chunks of what was then the developing world South Korea. Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, China and what was till lately a separate Hong Kong-India has fared abysmally. It began with a far better infrastructure than most of these countries had It suffered hardly or not at all during the Second World War. It had advantage like an English speaking elite, quality scientific manpower (including a Nobel laureate and other who could be ranked among the world's best) and excellent business acumen. Yet, today, when countries are ranked according to their global competitiveness, it is tiny Singapore that figures at the top. Hong Kong is an export powerhouse, so is Taiwan. If a symbol were needed to how far we have fallen back, note that while Korean Cielos are sold in India, no one is South Korea is rushing to buy an Indian car. The reason list themselves. Topmost is economic isolationism. |
| The government discouraged imports and encouraged self-sufficiency. Whatever the aim was, the result was the creation of a totally inefficient industry that failed to keep pace with global trends and, therefore, became absolutely uncompetitive. Only when the trade gates were opened a little did this become apparent. The years since then have been spent in merely trying to catch up. That the government actually sheltered its industrialists from foreign competition is a little strange. For in all other respects, it operated under the conviction that businessmen were little more than crooks how were to be prevented from entering the most important areas of the economy, how were to be hamstrung is as many ways as possible, how were to be tolerated in the same way as an inexcusable wart. The high expropriator rates taxation, the licensing laws, the reservation of whole swathes of industry for the public sector, and the granting of monopolies to the public sector firms were the principle manifestations of this attitude. The government forgot that before wealth could be distributed, it had to be created. |
| The government forgot it itself could not create, but only squander wealth. Some of the manifestation of the old attitude have changed. Tax rates have fallen licensing has been all but abolished. And the gates of global trade have been opened wide. But most of these changes were first by circumstances partly by the foreign exchange bankruptcy of 1991 and the recognition that the government could no longer muster the funds of support the public sector, leave alone expand it. Whether the attitude of the government itself, or that of more than handful of ministers, has changed one with. Business still has to negotiate a welter of negotiations. Transparency is still a longer way off. And there is no exit policy. In defending the existing policy, politicians betray an inability to see beyond their noses. A no-exit policy for labor is equivalent to a no-entry policy for new business. If one industry is not allowed to retrench labor, other industries will think a hundred times before employing new labor. In other ways too, the government hurts industries. |
| Public sector monopolies like the department of telecommunication and Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. make it possible for India business to operate only at a cost several times that the their counterparts abroad. The infrastructure is in a shambles partly because it is unable to formulate a sufficiently remunerative policy for private business, and partly because it does not have the stomach to change market rates for services. After a burst of activity in the early nineties, the government is dragging its feet. At the rate it is going, it will be another fifty years before the government realizes that a pro-business policy is the best pro-people policy. By then a course, the world would have moved even farther ahead. |
| Direction: In view of the passage given below. Choose the best option for question. When talks come to how India has done for itself in 50 years of Independence, the world has nothing but praise for our success in remaining a democracy. On other front, the applause is less loud in absolute terms, India has not done too badly, of course, life expectancy has increased so has literacy. Industry, which was barely a fledging, has grown tremendously. And as far as agriculture is concerned, India has been transformed from a country perpetually on the edge of starvation into a success story held up for others to emulate. But these are competitive times when changes is rapid, and to walk slowly when the rest of the world is running is almost as bad as standing still on walking backwards. |
| Compared with large chunks of what was then the developing world South Korea. Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, China and what was till lately a separate Hong Kong-India has fared abysmally. It began with a far better infrastructure than most of these countries had It suffered hardly or not at all during the Second World War. It had advantage like an English speaking elite, quality scientific manpower (including a Nobel laureate and other who could be ranked among the world's best) and excellent business acumen. Yet, today, when countries are ranked according to their global competitiveness, it is tiny Singapore that figures at the top. Hong Kong is an export powerhouse, so is Taiwan. If a symbol were needed to how far we have fallen back, note that while Korean Cielos are sold in India, no one is South Korea is rushing to buy an Indian car. The reason list themselves. Topmost is economic isolationism. |
| The government discouraged imports and encouraged self-sufficiency. Whatever the aim was, the result was the creation of a totally inefficient industry that failed to keep pace with global trends and, therefore, became absolutely uncompetitive. Only when the trade gates were opened a little did this become apparent. The years since then have been spent in merely trying to catch up. That the government actually sheltered its industrialists from foreign competition is a little strange. For in all other respects, it operated under the conviction that businessmen were little more than crooks how were to be prevented from entering the most important areas of the economy, how were to be hamstrung is as many ways as possible, how were to be tolerated in the same way as an inexcusable wart. The high expropriator rates taxation, the licensing laws, the reservation of whole swathes of industry for the public sector, and the granting of monopolies to the public sector firms were the principle manifestations of this attitude. The government forgot that before wealth could be distributed, it had to be created. |
| The government forgot it itself could not create, but only squander wealth. Some of the manifestation of the old attitude have changed. Tax rates have fallen licensing has been all but abolished. And the gates of global trade have been opened wide. But most of these changes were first by circumstances partly by the foreign exchange bankruptcy of 1991 and the recognition that the government could no longer muster the funds of support the public sector, leave alone expand it. Whether the attitude of the government itself, or that of more than handful of ministers, has changed one with. Business still has to negotiate a welter of negotiations. Transparency is still a longer way off. And there is no exit policy. In defending the existing policy, politicians betray an inability to see beyond their noses. A no-exit policy for labor is equivalent to a no-entry policy for new business. If one industry is not allowed to retrench labor, other industries will think a hundred times before employing new labor. In other ways too, the government hurts industries. |
| Public sector monopolies like the department of telecommunication and Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. make it possible for India business to operate only at a cost several times that the their counterparts abroad. The infrastructure is in a shambles partly because it is unable to formulate a sufficiently remunerative policy for private business, and partly because it does not have the stomach to change market rates for services. After a burst of activity in the early nineties, the government is dragging its feet. At the rate it is going, it will be another fifty years before the government realizes that a pro-business policy is the best pro-people policy. By then a course, the world would have moved even farther ahead. |
| Direction: In view of the passage given below. Choose the best option for question. When talks come to how India has done for itself in 50 years of Independence, the world has nothing but praise for our success in remaining a democracy. On other front, the applause is less loud in absolute terms, India has not done too badly, of course, life expectancy has increased so has literacy. Industry, which was barely a fledging, has grown tremendously. And as far as agriculture is concerned, India has been transformed from a country perpetually on the edge of starvation into a success story held up for others to emulate. But these are competitive times when changes is rapid, and to walk slowly when the rest of the world is running is almost as bad as standing still on walking backwards. |
| Compared with large chunks of what was then the developing world South Korea. Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, China and what was till lately a separate Hong Kong-India has fared abysmally. It began with a far better infrastructure than most of these countries had It suffered hardly or not at all during the Second World War. It had advantage like an English speaking elite, quality scientific manpower (including a Nobel laureate and other who could be ranked among the world's best) and excellent business acumen. Yet, today, when countries are ranked according to their global competitiveness, it is tiny Singapore that figures at the top. Hong Kong is an export powerhouse, so is Taiwan. If a symbol were needed to how far we have fallen back, note that while Korean Cielos are sold in India, no one is South Korea is rushing to buy an Indian car. The reason list themselves. Topmost is economic isolationism. |
| The government discouraged imports and encouraged self-sufficiency. Whatever the aim was, the result was the creation of a totally inefficient industry that failed to keep pace with global trends and, therefore, became absolutely uncompetitive. Only when the trade gates were opened a little did this become apparent. The years since then have been spent in merely trying to catch up. That the government actually sheltered its industrialists from foreign competition is a little strange. For in all other respects, it operated under the conviction that businessmen were little more than crooks how were to be prevented from entering the most important areas of the economy, how were to be hamstrung is as many ways as possible, how were to be tolerated in the same way as an inexcusable wart. The high expropriator rates taxation, the licensing laws, the reservation of whole swathes of industry for the public sector, and the granting of monopolies to the public sector firms were the principle manifestations of this attitude. The government forgot that before wealth could be distributed, it had to be created. |
| The government forgot it itself could not create, but only squander wealth. Some of the manifestation of the old attitude have changed. Tax rates have fallen licensing has been all but abolished. And the gates of global trade have been opened wide. But most of these changes were first by circumstances partly by the foreign exchange bankruptcy of 1991 and the recognition that the government could no longer muster the funds of support the public sector, leave alone expand it. Whether the attitude of the government itself, or that of more than handful of ministers, has changed one with. Business still has to negotiate a welter of negotiations. Transparency is still a longer way off. And there is no exit policy. In defending the existing policy, politicians betray an inability to see beyond their noses. A no-exit policy for labor is equivalent to a no-entry policy for new business. If one industry is not allowed to retrench labor, other industries will think a hundred times before employing new labor. In other ways too, the government hurts industries. |
| Public sector monopolies like the department of telecommunication and Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. make it possible for India business to operate only at a cost several times that the their counterparts abroad. The infrastructure is in a shambles partly because it is unable to formulate a sufficiently remunerative policy for private business, and partly because it does not have the stomach to change market rates for services. After a burst of activity in the early nineties, the government is dragging its feet. At the rate it is going, it will be another fifty years before the government realizes that a pro-business policy is the best pro-people policy. By then a course, the world would have moved even farther ahead. |
| Direction: In view of the passage given below. Choose the best option for question. When talks come to how India has done for itself in 50 years of Independence, the world has nothing but praise for our success in remaining a democracy. On other front, the applause is less loud in absolute terms, India has not done too badly, of course, life expectancy has increased so has literacy. Industry, which was barely a fledging, has grown tremendously. And as far as agriculture is concerned, India has been transformed from a country perpetually on the edge of starvation into a success story held up for others to emulate. But these are competitive times when changes is rapid, and to walk slowly when the rest of the world is running is almost as bad as standing still on walking backwards. |
| Compared with large chunks of what was then the developing world South Korea. Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, China and what was till lately a separate Hong Kong-India has fared abysmally. It began with a far better infrastructure than most of these countries had It suffered hardly or not at all during the Second World War. It had advantage like an English speaking elite, quality scientific manpower (including a Nobel laureate and other who could be ranked among the world's best) and excellent business acumen. Yet, today, when countries are ranked according to their global competitiveness, it is tiny Singapore that figures at the top. Hong Kong is an export powerhouse, so is Taiwan. If a symbol were needed to how far we have fallen back, note that while Korean Cielos are sold in India, no one is South Korea is rushing to buy an Indian car. The reason list themselves. Topmost is economic isolationism. |
| The government discouraged imports and encouraged self-sufficiency. Whatever the aim was, the result was the creation of a totally inefficient industry that failed to keep pace with global trends and, therefore, became absolutely uncompetitive. Only when the trade gates were opened a little did this become apparent. The years since then have been spent in merely trying to catch up. That the government actually sheltered its industrialists from foreign competition is a little strange. For in all other respects, it operated under the conviction that businessmen were little more than crooks how were to be prevented from entering the most important areas of the economy, how were to be hamstrung is as many ways as possible, how were to be tolerated in the same way as an inexcusable wart. The high expropriator rates taxation, the licensing laws, the reservation of whole swathes of industry for the public sector, and the granting of monopolies to the public sector firms were the principle manifestations of this attitude. The government forgot that before wealth could be distributed, it had to be created. |
| The government forgot it itself could not create, but only squander wealth. Some of the manifestation of the old attitude have changed. Tax rates have fallen licensing has been all but abolished. And the gates of global trade have been opened wide. But most of these changes were first by circumstances partly by the foreign exchange bankruptcy of 1991 and the recognition that the government could no longer muster the funds of support the public sector, leave alone expand it. Whether the attitude of the government itself, or that of more than handful of ministers, has changed one with. Business still has to negotiate a welter of negotiations. Transparency is still a longer way off. And there is no exit policy. In defending the existing policy, politicians betray an inability to see beyond their noses. A no-exit policy for labor is equivalent to a no-entry policy for new business. If one industry is not allowed to retrench labor, other industries will think a hundred times before employing new labor. In other ways too, the government hurts industries. |
| Public sector monopolies like the department of telecommunication and Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. make it possible for India business to operate only at a cost several times that the their counterparts abroad. The infrastructure is in a shambles partly because it is unable to formulate a sufficiently remunerative policy for private business, and partly because it does not have the stomach to change market rates for services. After a burst of activity in the early nineties, the government is dragging its feet. At the rate it is going, it will be another fifty years before the government realizes that a pro-business policy is the best pro-people policy. By then a course, the world would have moved even farther ahead. |
| Direction: In view of the passage given below. Choose the best option for question. When talks come to how India has done for itself in 50 years of Independence, the world has nothing but praise for our success in remaining a democracy. On other front, the applause is less loud in absolute terms, India has not done too badly, of course, life expectancy has increased so has literacy. Industry, which was barely a fledging, has grown tremendously. And as far as agriculture is concerned, India has been transformed from a country perpetually on the edge of starvation into a success story held up for others to emulate. But these are competitive times when changes is rapid, and to walk slowly when the rest of the world is running is almost as bad as standing still on walking backwards. |
| Compared with large chunks of what was then the developing world South Korea. Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, China and what was till lately a separate Hong Kong-India has fared abysmally. It began with a far better infrastructure than most of these countries had It suffered hardly or not at all during the Second World War. It had advantage like an English speaking elite, quality scientific manpower (including a Nobel laureate and other who could be ranked among the world's best) and excellent business acumen. Yet, today, when countries are ranked according to their global competitiveness, it is tiny Singapore that figures at the top. Hong Kong is an export powerhouse, so is Taiwan. If a symbol were needed to how far we have fallen back, note that while Korean Cielos are sold in India, no one is South Korea is rushing to buy an Indian car. The reason list themselves. Topmost is economic isolationism. |
| The government discouraged imports and encouraged self-sufficiency. Whatever the aim was, the result was the creation of a totally inefficient industry that failed to keep pace with global trends and, therefore, became absolutely uncompetitive. Only when the trade gates were opened a little did this become apparent. The years since then have been spent in merely trying to catch up. That the government actually sheltered its industrialists from foreign competition is a little strange. For in all other respects, it operated under the conviction that businessmen were little more than crooks how were to be prevented from entering the most important areas of the economy, how were to be hamstrung is as many ways as possible, how were to be tolerated in the same way as an inexcusable wart. The high expropriator rates taxation, the licensing laws, the reservation of whole swathes of industry for the public sector, and the granting of monopolies to the public sector firms were the principle manifestations of this attitude. The government forgot that before wealth could be distributed, it had to be created. |
| The government forgot it itself could not create, but only squander wealth. Some of the manifestation of the old attitude have changed. Tax rates have fallen licensing has been all but abolished. And the gates of global trade have been opened wide. But most of these changes were first by circumstances partly by the foreign exchange bankruptcy of 1991 and the recognition that the government could no longer muster the funds of support the public sector, leave alone expand it. Whether the attitude of the government itself, or that of more than handful of ministers, has changed one with. Business still has to negotiate a welter of negotiations. Transparency is still a longer way off. And there is no exit policy. In defending the existing policy, politicians betray an inability to see beyond their noses. A no-exit policy for labor is equivalent to a no-entry policy for new business. If one industry is not allowed to retrench labor, other industries will think a hundred times before employing new labor. In other ways too, the government hurts industries. |
| Public sector monopolies like the department of telecommunication and Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. make it possible for India business to operate only at a cost several times that the their counterparts abroad. The infrastructure is in a shambles partly because it is unable to formulate a sufficiently remunerative policy for private business, and partly because it does not have the stomach to change market rates for services. After a burst of activity in the early nineties, the government is dragging its feet. At the rate it is going, it will be another fifty years before the government realizes that a pro-business policy is the best pro-people policy. By then a course, the world would have moved even farther ahead. |
| Direction: In view of the passage given below. Choose the best option for question. When talks come to how India has done for itself in 50 years of Independence, the world has nothing but praise for our success in remaining a democracy. On other front, the applause is less loud in absolute terms, India has not done too badly, of course, life expectancy has increased so has literacy. Industry, which was barely a fledging, has grown tremendously. And as far as agriculture is concerned, India has been transformed from a country perpetually on the edge of starvation into a success story held up for others to emulate. But these are competitive times when changes is rapid, and to walk slowly when the rest of the world is running is almost as bad as standing still on walking backwards. |
| Compared with large chunks of what was then the developing world South Korea. Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, China and what was till lately a separate Hong Kong-India has fared abysmally. It began with a far better infrastructure than most of these countries had It suffered hardly or not at all during the Second World War. It had advantage like an English speaking elite, quality scientific manpower (including a Nobel laureate and other who could be ranked among the world's best) and excellent business acumen. Yet, today, when countries are ranked according to their global competitiveness, it is tiny Singapore that figures at the top. Hong Kong is an export powerhouse, so is Taiwan. If a symbol were needed to how far we have fallen back, note that while Korean Cielos are sold in India, no one is South Korea is rushing to buy an Indian car. The reason list themselves. Topmost is economic isolationism. |
| The government discouraged imports and encouraged self-sufficiency. Whatever the aim was, the result was the creation of a totally inefficient industry that failed to keep pace with global trends and, therefore, became absolutely uncompetitive. Only when the trade gates were opened a little did this become apparent. The years since then have been spent in merely trying to catch up. That the government actually sheltered its industrialists from foreign competition is a little strange. For in all other respects, it operated under the conviction that businessmen were little more than crooks how were to be prevented from entering the most important areas of the economy, how were to be hamstrung is as many ways as possible, how were to be tolerated in the same way as an inexcusable wart. The high expropriator rates taxation, the licensing laws, the reservation of whole swathes of industry for the public sector, and the granting of monopolies to the public sector firms were the principle manifestations of this attitude. The government forgot that before wealth could be distributed, it had to be created. |
| The government forgot it itself could not create, but only squander wealth. Some of the manifestation of the old attitude have changed. Tax rates have fallen licensing has been all but abolished. And the gates of global trade have been opened wide. But most of these changes were first by circumstances partly by the foreign exchange bankruptcy of 1991 and the recognition that the government could no longer muster the funds of support the public sector, leave alone expand it. Whether the attitude of the government itself, or that of more than handful of ministers, has changed one with. Business still has to negotiate a welter of negotiations. Transparency is still a longer way off. And there is no exit policy. In defending the existing policy, politicians betray an inability to see beyond their noses. A no-exit policy for labor is equivalent to a no-entry policy for new business. If one industry is not allowed to retrench labor, other industries will think a hundred times before employing new labor. In other ways too, the government hurts industries. |
| Public sector monopolies like the department of telecommunication and Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. make it possible for India business to operate only at a cost several times that the their counterparts abroad. The infrastructure is in a shambles partly because it is unable to formulate a sufficiently remunerative policy for private business, and partly because it does not have the stomach to change market rates for services. After a burst of activity in the early nineties, the government is dragging its feet. At the rate it is going, it will be another fifty years before the government realizes that a pro-business policy is the best pro-people policy. By then a course, the world would have moved even farther ahead. |
| Direction: In view of the passage given below. Choose the best option for question. When talks come to how India has done for itself in 50 years of Independence, the world has nothing but praise for our success in remaining a democracy. On other front, the applause is less loud in absolute terms, India has not done too badly, of course, life expectancy has increased so has literacy. Industry, which was barely a fledging, has grown tremendously. And as far as agriculture is concerned, India has been transformed from a country perpetually on the edge of starvation into a success story held up for others to emulate. But these are competitive times when changes is rapid, and to walk slowly when the rest of the world is running is almost as bad as standing still on walking backwards. |
| Compared with large chunks of what was then the developing world South Korea. Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, China and what was till lately a separate Hong Kong-India has fared abysmally. It began with a far better infrastructure than most of these countries had It suffered hardly or not at all during the Second World War. It had advantage like an English speaking elite, quality scientific manpower (including a Nobel laureate and other who could be ranked among the world's best) and excellent business acumen. Yet, today, when countries are ranked according to their global competitiveness, it is tiny Singapore that figures at the top. Hong Kong is an export powerhouse, so is Taiwan. If a symbol were needed to how far we have fallen back, note that while Korean Cielos are sold in India, no one is South Korea is rushing to buy an Indian car. The reason list themselves. Topmost is economic isolationism. |
| The government discouraged imports and encouraged self-sufficiency. Whatever the aim was, the result was the creation of a totally inefficient industry that failed to keep pace with global trends and, therefore, became absolutely uncompetitive. Only when the trade gates were opened a little did this become apparent. The years since then have been spent in merely trying to catch up. That the government actually sheltered its industrialists from foreign competition is a little strange. For in all other respects, it operated under the conviction that businessmen were little more than crooks how were to be prevented from entering the most important areas of the economy, how were to be hamstrung is as many ways as possible, how were to be tolerated in the same way as an inexcusable wart. The high expropriator rates taxation, the licensing laws, the reservation of whole swathes of industry for the public sector, and the granting of monopolies to the public sector firms were the principle manifestations of this attitude. The government forgot that before wealth could be distributed, it had to be created. |
| The government forgot it itself could not create, but only squander wealth. Some of the manifestation of the old attitude have changed. Tax rates have fallen licensing has been all but abolished. And the gates of global trade have been opened wide. But most of these changes were first by circumstances partly by the foreign exchange bankruptcy of 1991 and the recognition that the government could no longer muster the funds of support the public sector, leave alone expand it. Whether the attitude of the government itself, or that of more than handful of ministers, has changed one with. Business still has to negotiate a welter of negotiations. Transparency is still a longer way off. And there is no exit policy. In defending the existing policy, politicians betray an inability to see beyond their noses. A no-exit policy for labor is equivalent to a no-entry policy for new business. If one industry is not allowed to retrench labor, other industries will think a hundred times before employing new labor. In other ways too, the government hurts industries. |
| Public sector monopolies like the department of telecommunication and Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. make it possible for India business to operate only at a cost several times that the their counterparts abroad. The infrastructure is in a shambles partly because it is unable to formulate a sufficiently remunerative policy for private business, and partly because it does not have the stomach to change market rates for services. After a burst of activity in the early nineties, the government is dragging its feet. At the rate it is going, it will be another fifty years before the government realizes that a pro-business policy is the best pro-people policy. By then a course, the world would have moved even farther ahead. |
| Direction: Choose the option closest in meaning to the Capitalized word. |
| Direction: Choose the option closest in meaning to the Capitalized word. |
| Direction: Choose the option closest in meaning to the Capitalized word. |
| A. High Altitude Warfare | 1. Chennai |
| B. Indian Air force Training Center | 2. Gulmarg |
| C. National Defense Delhi College | 3. New |
| D. Institute of National Integration | 4. Pune |
| What is the correct sequence of the following movements in chronological order? |
| 1. Civil Disobedience Movement |
| 2. Khilafat Movement |
| 3. Home Rule Movement |
| 4. Quit India Movement |
| President Paranab Mukherjee on 6 January 2015 signed the ordinance to amend Citizenship Act, 1955. Which of the statements in this regard is/are right? |
| I. The ordinance exempts Person of Indian Origin (PIO) from appearing before the local police station on every visit. |
| II. It replaced the clause that says foreigners marrying Indians must continuously stay in the country for a period of six months before they get an Indian citizenship |
| Direction: Answer the questioned based on the information given in the following table A, B, C, D, E denote companies and 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 & 2010 denote years. |
| Number of Units Manufactured (M) and Number of United Sold (S) (in hundreds) by five different companies over the years. |
| A B C D E |
| M S M S M S M S M S |
| 2006 2.8 1.3 3.3 2.2 2.6 1.7 3.0 2.2 1.9 1.4 |
| 2007 3.2 2.0 2.4 1.6 2.2 1.5 2.5 1.9 2.0 1.7 |
| 2008 1.9 0.9 2.9 1.6 2.1 1.0 2.3 1.5 1.6 1.1 |
| 2009 10.0 0.4 2.4 1.3 2.8 1.4 2.1 1.2 3.2 2.5 |
| 2010 2.5 1.5 2.3 1.2 2.6 2.1 1.8 1.1 3.1 2.6 |
| Direction: Answer the questioned based on the information given in the following table A, B, C, D, E denote companies and 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 & 2010 denote years. |
| Number of Units Manufactured (M) and Number of United Sold (S) (in hundreds) by five different companies over the years. |
| A B C D E |
| M S M S M S M S M S |
| 2006 2.8 1.3 3.3 2.2 2.6 1.7 3.0 2.2 1.9 1.4 |
| 2007 3.2 2.0 2.4 1.6 2.2 1.5 2.5 1.9 2.0 1.7 |
| 2008 1.9 0.9 2.9 1.6 2.1 1.0 2.3 1.5 1.6 1.1 |
| 2009 10.0 0.4 2.4 1.3 2.8 1.4 2.1 1.2 3.2 2.5 |
| 2010 2.5 1.5 2.3 1.2 2.6 2.1 1.8 1.1 3.1 2.6 |
| Direction: Answer the questioned based on the information given in the following table A, B, C, D, E denote companies and 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 & 2010 denote years. |
| Number of Units Manufactured (M) and Number of United Sold (S) (in hundreds) by five different companies over the years. |
| A B C D E |
| M S M S M S M S M S |
| 2006 2.8 1.3 3.3 2.2 2.6 1.7 3.0 2.2 1.9 1.4 |
| 2007 3.2 2.0 2.4 1.6 2.2 1.5 2.5 1.9 2.0 1.7 |
| 2008 1.9 0.9 2.9 1.6 2.1 1.0 2.3 1.5 1.6 1.1 |
| 2009 10.0 0.4 2.4 1.3 2.8 1.4 2.1 1.2 3.2 2.5 |
| 2010 2.5 1.5 2.3 1.2 2.6 2.1 1.8 1.1 3.1 2.6 |
| Direction: Answer the questioned based on the information given in the following table A, B, C, D, E denote companies and 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 & 2010 denote years. |
| Number of Units Manufactured (M) and Number of United Sold (S) (in hundreds) by five different companies over the years. |
| A B C D E |
| M S M S M S M S M S |
| 2006 2.8 1.3 3.3 2.2 2.6 1.7 3.0 2.2 1.9 1.4 |
| 2007 3.2 2.0 2.4 1.6 2.2 1.5 2.5 1.9 2.0 1.7 |
| 2008 1.9 0.9 2.9 1.6 2.1 1.0 2.3 1.5 1.6 1.1 |
| 2009 10.0 0.4 2.4 1.3 2.8 1.4 2.1 1.2 3.2 2.5 |
| 2010 2.5 1.5 2.3 1.2 2.6 2.1 1.8 1.1 3.1 2.6 |
| Direction: Answer the questioned based on the information given in the following table A, B, C, D, E denote companies and 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 & 2010 denote years. |
| Number of Units Manufactured (M) and Number of United Sold (S) (in hundreds) by five different companies over the years. |
| A B C D E |
| M S M S M S M S M S |
| 2006 2.8 1.3 3.3 2.2 2.6 1.7 3.0 2.2 1.9 1.4 |
| 2007 3.2 2.0 2.4 1.6 2.2 1.5 2.5 1.9 2.0 1.7 |
| 2008 1.9 0.9 2.9 1.6 2.1 1.0 2.3 1.5 1.6 1.1 |
| 2009 10.0 0.4 2.4 1.3 2.8 1.4 2.1 1.2 3.2 2.5 |
| 2010 2.5 1.5 2.3 1.2 2.6 2.1 1.8 1.1 3.1 2.6 |
| Direction: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option. |
| Principle: Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person's consent moves that property, such taking is said to commit theft. |
| Fact: RAMU cuts down a tree on RINKU'S ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of RINKU'S possession without RINKU'S consent. A could not take the tree away. |
| Direction: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option. |
| Principle: injuria sine damnum i.e. injury without damage. |
| Fact: SONU, who was a returning officer at a polling booth, wrongly refused to register a duly tendered vote of MONU, though he was a qualified voter. The candidate, whom MONU sought to vote was declared elected |
| Direction: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option. |
| Principle: A person is said to be of sound mind for the purpose of making a contract if, at the time when he makes it, he is capable of understanding it and of forming a rational judgment as to its effect upon his interests. |
| Facts: Mr. X who is usually of sound mind, but occasionally of unsound mind enters into a contract with Mr. Y when he is of unsound mind. Y came to know about this fact afterwards and now wants to file a suit against Mr. X. |
| Direction: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option. |
| Principle: When one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing any- thing, with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to such act or abstinence, he said to make a proposal. |
| Fact: 'Ramanuj telegrammed to the Shyamsunder, writing: 'will you sell me your Rolls Royce CAR? Telegram the lowest cash price.' Shyamsunder replied, too by telegram: 'Lowest price for CAR is Rs 20 lacs,' Ramanuj immediately sends his consent through telegram stating: 'I agree to buy the CAR or Rs 20 lacs asked by you'. Now Shyamsunder refused to sell the CAR. |
| Direction: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option. |
| Principle: A master is liable for the acts committed by his servant in the course of employment. |
| Fact: Sanjay is a driver working in Brooke bond and Co. One day, the Manager asked him to drop a customer at the airport and get back at the earliest. On his way back from the airport, he happened to see his finance Ruhina waiting for a bus to go home. He offered to drop her at home, which happened to be close to his office. She got into the car and soon thereafter; the car somersaulted due to the negligence of Sanjey. Ruhina was thrown out of the car and suffered multiple injuries. She seeks compensation from Brookebond and Co. |
| Direction: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option. |
| Principle: Nuisance as a tort (civil wrong) means an unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. |
| Fact: During the scarcity of onions, long queues were made outside the defendant's shop who having a license to sell fruits and vegetables used to sell only 1 kg. of onion per ration card The queues extended on to the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighboring shops. The neighboring shopkeepers brought an action for nuisance against the defendant. |
| Direction: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option. |
| Principle: Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who, at the time of doing it, by reason of unsoundness of mind, is incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong or contrary to law. |
| Fact: A takes his son B who is three years old, for a bath to the well. He throws his son inside the well so that he could have a good bath. After 10 minutes he also jumped in the well to take a bath and take his son out of the well. Both were rescued by the villagers but his son was found dead. |
| Direction: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option. |
| Principle: ignorantia juris non excusat and ignorantia facit excusat. |
| Fact: George was a passenger from Zurich to Manila in a Swiss Plane When the plane landed at the airport at Bombay on 28th Nov. 1962 it was found on search that George carried 34 kgs of gold bars in person and that he had not declared -it in the 'Manifest for transit'. On 26th Nov. 1962 Government issued a notification and modifies its earlier exemption and now it is necessary that. The gold must be declared in the 'Manifest' of the aircraft. |
| Direction: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option. |
| Principle: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid an act or omission which he can foresee would injure his neighbor. The neighbor for this purpose, is any person whom he should have in his mind as likely to be affected by his act. |
| Fact: Krishnan, while driving a car at high speed in crowded road, knocked down a cyclist. The cyclist died on the spot with a lot of blood spilling around. Lakshmi, a pregnant woman passing by, suffered from a nervous shock, leading to abortion. Lakshmi filed a suit against Krishnan claiming damages. |
| Direction: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option. |
| Principle: Preparation is not an offence except the preparation of some special offences. |
| Fact: Ramesh keeps poisoned halua in his house, wishing to kill Binoy whom he invited to a party and to whom he wishes to give it. Unknown to Ramesh, his only son takes the halua and dies. In this case |
| Direction: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option. |
| Principle: Agreements, the meaning of which is not certain, or capable of being made certain, are void. |
| Fact: A horse was bought for a certain price couple with a promise to give Rs 500 more if the horse proved lucky. |
| Direction: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option. |
| Principle: Mere silence as to facts likely to affect the willingness of a person to enter into a contract is not fraud, unless the circumstances of the case are such that, regard being had to them, it is the duty of the person keeping silence to speak, or unless his silence is, in itself, equivalent to speech. |
| Fact: A sells, by auction, to B, a horse which A knows to be unsound A says nothing to B about the horse's unsoundness. |
| Direction: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option. |
| Principle: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebody's possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods. |
| Fact: A purchased a car from a person who had no title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair, X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage. |
| Direction: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option. |
| Principle: Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation. |
| Fact: Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan. |
| Direction: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option. |
| Principle: Doctrine of Double Jeopardy: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence twice. |
| Fact: Maqbool brought some gold into India without making any declaration to Custom department on the airport. The custom authority's confiscated the gold under the Sea Custom Act. Maqbool was later charged for having committed an offence under Foreign Exchange Regulation Act. |
| Direction: The question consist of two statements, one labelled as Assertion [A] ad other as Reason (R). You are to examine the two statements carefully and select the best option. |
| Assertion: Custom per se is law. Independent of prior recognition by the sovereign or the judge. |
| Reason: Custom is source of law but by itself is not law. |
| Direction: The question consist of two statements, one labelled as Assertion [A] ad other as Reason (R). You are to examine the two statements carefully and select the best option. |
| Assertion: Idol is a person who can hold property. |
| Reason: Only human being can be called person not the lifeless things. |
| Direction: The question consist of two statements, one labelled as Assertion [A] ad other as Reason (R). You are to examine the two statements carefully and select the best option. |
| Assertion: Laws are means of achieving an end namely social control. |
| Reason: The ultimate end of law is to secure greatest happiness to greater number. |
| Direction: The question consist of two statements, one labelled as Assertion [A] ad other as Reason (R). You are to examine the two statements carefully and select the best option. |
| Assertion: Every person should have the freedom of speech and expression. |
| Reason: If a person is stopped from speaking then mankind will lose the truth. |
| Direction: The question consist of two statements, one labelled as Assertion [A] ad other as Reason (R). You are to examine the two statements carefully and select the best option. |
| Assertion: Attempt to commit an offence though does not result in any harm, should also be punished. |
| Reason: A person who tries to cause a prohibited harm and fails, is, in terms of more culpability, not materially different from the person who tries and succeeds. |
| Direction: The question consist of two statements, one labelled as Assertion [A] ad other as Reason (R). You are to examine the two statements carefully and select the best option. |
| Assertion: In India, every state has a High Court in its territory. |
| Reason: The Constitution of India provides for a High Court in each state. |
| Direction: The question consist of two statements, one labelled as Assertion [A] ad other as Reason (R). You are to examine the two statements carefully and select the best option. |
| Assertion: The Council of Ministers at the center is collectively responsible both to the Low Sabha and Rajya Sabha. |
| Reason: The members of both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha are eligible to be ministers of the Union Government. |
| Direction: The question consist of two statements, one labelled as Assertion [A] ad other as Reason (R). You are to examine the two statements carefully and select the best option. |
| Assertion: The reservation of thirty-three per cent of seats for women in Parliament and State Legislature does not require Constitutions Amendment. |
| Reason: Political parties contesting election can allocate thirty-three per cent of seats they contest to women candidates without any Constitutions Amendment. |
| Direction: The question consist of two statements, one labelled as Assertion [A] ad other as Reason (R). You are to examine the two statements carefully and select the best option. |
| Assertion: We, the people of India, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into c Democratic Republic. |
| Reason: A republic will ensure we have a head of state that is democratically elected and accountable to voters. As a result the head of state will be a more effective constitutional safeguard. |
| Direction: The question consist of two statements, one labelled as Assertion [A] ad other as Reason (R). You are to examine the two statements carefully and select the best option. |
| Assertion: Republic Day is celebrated on 26th January every year in the country. |
| Reason: The Constitution of India came into force 26th January 1950 |
| Direction: Read the definition and elements of the attempt, apply them on the given fact situation and answer the question: |
| Definition of attempt: Lord Blackburn has said that 'there is no doubt there is difference between a preparation antecedent to an attempt and the actual attempt, but if the actual transaction has commenced which would have ended in the crime if not interrupted, there is clearly an attempt to commit the crime |
| 1. Fault element: Intention or knowledge requisite for committing an offence; and |
| 2. Conduct Element: does any act towards its com- mission and has crossed the stage of preparation. This act is so closely connected with, and proximate to the commission that it fails in object because of facts not known to him or because of circumstances beyond his control. |
| Direction: Read the definition and elements of the attempt, apply them on the given fact situation and answer the question: |
| Definition of attempt: Lord Blackburn has said that 'there is no doubt there is difference between a preparation antecedent to an attempt and the actual attempt, but if the actual transaction has commenced which would have ended in the crime if not interrupted, there is clearly an attempt to commit the crime |
| 1. Fault element: Intention or knowledge requisite for committing an offence; and |
| 2. Conduct Element: does any act towards its com- mission and has crossed the stage of preparation. This act is so closely connected with, and proximate to the commission that it fails in object because of facts not known to him or because of circumstances beyond his control. |
| Direction: Read the definition and elements of the attempt, apply them on the given fact situation and answer the question: |
| Definition of attempt: Lord Blackburn has said that 'there is no doubt there is difference between a preparation antecedent to an attempt and the actual attempt, but if the actual transaction has commenced which would have ended in the crime if not interrupted, there is clearly an attempt to commit the crime |
| 1. Fault element: Intention or knowledge requisite for committing an offence; and |
| 2. Conduct Element: does any act towards its com- mission and has crossed the stage of preparation. This act is so closely connected with, and proximate to the commission that it fails in object because of facts not known to him or because of circumstances beyond his control. |
| Direction: Pill in the blanks: Choose the pair of words which complete the sentence to make logical sense. |
| Direction: Pill in the blanks: Choose the pair of words which complete the sentence to make logical sense. |
| Direction: Pill in the blanks: Choose the pair of words which complete the sentence to make logical sense. |
| Direction: Pill in the blanks: Choose the pair of words which complete the sentence to make logical sense. |
| Choose the best option for the following statement: No one can be compelled to sing the National Anthem since: |
| 1 It will be violative of the right to freedom of speech and expression |
| 2 It will be violative of the right to freedom of conscience and practice & propagation of religion. |
| 3. There is no legal provision obliging anyone to sing the National Anthem. |
| Consider the following statements and choose the best option: |
| 1. The Chairman of the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) is the Chief Justice of |
| India. |
| 2. Chief Justice Mr. Justice H. L. Dattu is the present Chairman of NALSA. |
| 3. The Chairman of the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) is the senior most judge (after CJI) of the Supreme Court of India. |
| 4. Hon'ble Mr. Justice T. S. Thakur is the present Chairman of NALSA. |
| Choose the best option for the following statement: |
| The distinction between fraud and misrepresentation: |
| 1. Fraud is more or less intentional wrong. Whereas misrepresentation may be quite innocent. |
| 2. In addition to rendering the contract voidable, is a cause of action in tort for damages. Simple misrepresentation is not a tort but a person who rightfully rescinds a contract is entitled to compensation for any damages which he has sustained through the non-fulfilment of the contract. |
| 3. A person complaining of misrepresentation can be met with the defense that he had the means of discovering the truth with ordinary diligence. But excepting fraud by silence in other cases of fraud it is no defense that 'the plaintiff had the means of discovering the truth by ordinary diligence.' |
| 4. None of the above. |
| Select the correct statement on Social Justice Bench Constituted on social issue |
| 1. Constituted by Supreme Court on 3 December 2014 |
| 2. Started operation on 12 December 2014 |
| 3. The brainchild of Chief Justice of India H L Dattu |
| 4. Two-judge bench to be headed by Justice Madan B Lokur |
| 5. The other member is Justice U U Lalit |
| Select the correct statement about 14th Finance Commission which submitted its report to president |
| 1. It covers the period between 1 April 2015 and 31 March 2020. |
| 2. The Commission headed by former RBI Governor Y V Reddy. |
| 3. Provides for devolution of tax receipts from the Centre to the States. |
| 4. Article 280 of Constitution provides for appointment of Finance Commission. |
| 5. 1st and 13th Finance Commission was headed by K C Neogy & Dr. Vijay Kelkar respectively. |
| Direction: W, X, Y and Z are four friends, who do not mind exchanging items. X has two chessboards each costing Rs 500, and a record player. Z originally had a cycle and a Walkman. Each cricket bat cost Rs 700. Both W and Z got a cricket bat from Y. X gave his record player costing Rs 2000 to Y. Z get a camera costing Rs 1500 from W. The cycle of Z costs Rs 1000 and the Walkman is for Rs 700. Y had three cricket bats at the beginning and W had two cameras the total cost of which is Rs 500 X gave one of his chessboards Z and Z's cycle. Z gave his Walkman to W. |
| Direction: W, X, Y and Z are four friends, who do not mind exchanging items. X has two chessboards each costing Rs 500, and a record player. Z originally had a cycle and a Walkman. Each cricket bat cost Rs 700. Both W and Z got a cricket bat from Y. X gave his record player costing Rs 2000 to Y. Z get a camera costing Rs 1500 from W. The cycle of Z costs Rs 1000 and the Walkman is for Rs 700. Y had three cricket bats at the beginning and W had two cameras the total cost of which is Rs 500 X gave one of his chessboards Z and Z's cycle. Z gave his Walkman to W. |
| Direction: W, X, Y and Z are four friends, who do not mind exchanging items. X has two chessboards each costing Rs 500, and a record player. Z originally had a cycle and a Walkman. Each cricket bat cost Rs 700. Both W and Z got a cricket bat from Y. X gave his record player costing Rs 2000 to Y. Z get a camera costing Rs 1500 from W. The cycle of Z costs Rs 1000 and the Walkman is for Rs 700. Y had three cricket bats at the beginning and W had two cameras the total cost of which is Rs 500 X gave one of his chessboards Z and Z's cycle. Z gave his Walkman to W. |
| Direction: W, X, Y and Z are four friends, who do not mind exchanging items. X has two chessboards each costing Rs 500, and a record player. Z originally had a cycle and a Walkman. Each cricket bat cost Rs 700. Both W and Z got a cricket bat from Y. X gave his record player costing Rs 2000 to Y. Z get a camera costing Rs 1500 from W. The cycle of Z costs Rs 1000 and the Walkman is for Rs 700. Y had three cricket bats at the beginning and W had two cameras the total cost of which is Rs 500 X gave one of his chessboards Z and Z's cycle. Z gave his Walkman to W. |
| Direction: W, X, Y and Z are four friends, who do not mind exchanging items. X has two chessboards each costing Rs 500, and a record player. Z originally had a cycle and a Walkman. Each cricket bat cost Rs 700. Both W and Z got a cricket bat from Y. X gave his record player costing Rs 2000 to Y. Z get a camera costing Rs 1500 from W. The cycle of Z costs Rs 1000 and the Walkman is for Rs 700. Y had three cricket bats at the beginning and W had two cameras the total cost of which is Rs 500 X gave one of his chessboards Z and Z's cycle. Z gave his Walkman to W. |
| Direction: W, X, Y and Z are four friends, who do not mind exchanging items. X has two chessboards each costing Rs 500, and a record player. Z originally had a cycle and a Walkman. Each cricket bat cost Rs 700. Both W and Z got a cricket bat from Y. X gave his record player costing Rs 2000 to Y. Z get a camera costing Rs 1500 from W. The cycle of Z costs Rs 1000 and the Walkman is for Rs 700. Y had three cricket bats at the beginning and W had two cameras the total cost of which is Rs 500 X gave one of his chessboards Z and Z's cycle. Z gave his Walkman to W. |
| Direction: W, X, Y and Z are four friends, who do not mind exchanging items. X has two chessboards each costing Rs 500, and a record player. Z originally had a cycle and a Walkman. Each cricket bat cost Rs 700. Both W and Z got a cricket bat from Y. X gave his record player costing Rs 2000 to Y. Z get a camera costing Rs 1500 from W. The cycle of Z costs Rs 1000 and the Walkman is for Rs 700. Y had three cricket bats at the beginning and W had two cameras the total cost of which is Rs 500 X gave one of his chessboards Z and Z's cycle. Z gave his Walkman to W. |
| Direction: W, X, Y and Z are four friends, who do not mind exchanging items. X has two chessboards each costing Rs 500, and a record player. Z originally had a cycle and a Walkman. Each cricket bat cost Rs 700. Both W and Z got a cricket bat from Y. X gave his record player costing Rs 2000 to Y. Z get a camera costing Rs 1500 from W. The cycle of Z costs Rs 1000 and the Walkman is for Rs 700. Y had three cricket bats at the beginning and W had two cameras the total cost of which is Rs 500 X gave one of his chessboards Z and Z's cycle. Z gave his Walkman to W. |
| Direction: Recently, the answers of a test held nationwide were leaked to a group of unscrupulous people. The investigative agency has arrested the mastermind at nine other people, A. B, C, D, E, F, G, H and I this matter. Interrogating the following facts have been obtained regarding their operation. Initially, the mastermind obtains the correct answer' key. All the others create their answer-key from one or two people already possess the same. These people are called his/her 'source'. If the person has two sources, then he/she compares the answer-key obtained for both sources. If the key to a question from hot sources is identical, it is copied, and otherwise it is left blank. If the person has only one source, he/she copies the source answer into his/her copy. Finally, each person compulsorily replaces one of the answers (not a blank one) with a wrong answer in his/her answer key. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The paper contained 200 question; so the investigative agency has ruled out the possibility of two or more them introducing wrong answers to the same question. The investigative agency has a copy of the correct answer key and has tabulated the following data. This data represents question numbers. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Direction: Recently, the answers of a test held nationwide were leaked to a group of unscrupulous people. The investigative agency has arrested the mastermind at nine other people, A. B, C, D, E, F, G, H and I this matter. Interrogating the following facts have been obtained regarding their operation. Initially, the mastermind obtains the correct answer' key. All the others create their answer-key from one or two people already possess the same. These people are called his/her 'source'. If the person has two sources, then he/she compares the answer-key obtained for both sources. If the key to a question from hot sources is identical, it is copied, and otherwise it is left blank. If the person has only one source, he/she copies the source answer into his/her copy. Finally, each person compulsorily replaces one of the answers (not a blank one) with a wrong answer in his/her answer key. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The paper contained 200 question; so the investigative agency has ruled out the possibility of two or more them introducing wrong answers to the same question. The investigative agency has a copy of the correct answer key and has tabulated the following data. This data represents question numbers. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Direction: Recently, the answers of a test held nationwide were leaked to a group of unscrupulous people. The investigative agency has arrested the mastermind at nine other people, A. B, C, D, E, F, G, H and I this matter. Interrogating the following facts have been obtained regarding their operation. Initially, the mastermind obtains the correct answer' key. All the others create their answer-key from one or two people already possess the same. These people are called his/her 'source'. If the person has two sources, then he/she compares the answer-key obtained for both sources. If the key to a question from hot sources is identical, it is copied, and otherwise it is left blank. If the person has only one source, he/she copies the source answer into his/her copy. Finally, each person compulsorily replaces one of the answers (not a blank one) with a wrong answer in his/her answer key. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The paper contained 200 question; so the investigative agency has ruled out the possibility of two or more them introducing wrong answers to the same question. The investigative agency has a copy of the correct answer key and has tabulated the following data. This data represents question numbers. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Direction: Recently, the answers of a test held nationwide were leaked to a group of unscrupulous people. The investigative agency has arrested the mastermind at nine other people, A. B, C, D, E, F, G, H and I this matter. Interrogating the following facts have been obtained regarding their operation. Initially, the mastermind obtains the correct answer' key. All the others create their answer-key from one or two people already possess the same. These people are called his/her 'source'. If the person has two sources, then he/she compares the answer-key obtained for both sources. If the key to a question from hot sources is identical, it is copied, and otherwise it is left blank. If the person has only one source, he/she copies the source answer into his/her copy. Finally, each person compulsorily replaces one of the answers (not a blank one) with a wrong answer in his/her answer key. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The paper contained 200 question; so the investigative agency has ruled out the possibility of two or more them introducing wrong answers to the same question. The investigative agency has a copy of the correct answer key and has tabulated the following data. This data represents question numbers. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Direction: Recently, the answers of a test held nationwide were leaked to a group of unscrupulous people. The investigative agency has arrested the mastermind at nine other people, A. B, C, D, E, F, G, H and I this matter. Interrogating the following facts have been obtained regarding their operation. Initially, the mastermind obtains the correct answer' key. All the others create their answer-key from one or two people already possess the same. These people are called his/her 'source'. If the person has two sources, then he/she compares the answer-key obtained for both sources. If the key to a question from hot sources is identical, it is copied, and otherwise it is left blank. If the person has only one source, he/she copies the source answer into his/her copy. Finally, each person compulsorily replaces one of the answers (not a blank one) with a wrong answer in his/her answer key. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The paper contained 200 question; so the investigative agency has ruled out the possibility of two or more them introducing wrong answers to the same question. The investigative agency has a copy of the correct answer key and has tabulated the following data. This data represents question numbers. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Which of the following two groups of people has identical sources? |
| I. A. D and G |
| II. E and H |
| Direction: In the following question, a group of numerals is given followed by four groups of symbol/letter combination letters [A], [B], [C] and [D]. Numerals are to be coded as per the codes and conditions. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| You have to find out which of the combinations [A], [B], [C] and [D] is correct and indicate your answer accordingly. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1. If the first digit as well as the last digit is odd both are to be coded as 'X'. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2. If the first digit as well as the last digit is even, both are to be coded as ' ' | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3. If the last digit is '0'. it is to be coded as #. |
| Direction: In the following question, a group of numerals is given followed by four groups of symbol/letter combination letters [A], [B], [C] and [D]. Numerals are to be coded as per the codes and conditions. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| You have to find out which of the combinations [A], [B], [C] and [D] is correct and indicate your answer accordingly. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1. If the first digit as well as the last digit is odd both are to be coded as 'X'. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2. If the first digit as well as the last digit is even, both are to be coded as '' | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3. If the last digit is '0'. it is to be coded as #. |
| Direction: In the following question, a group of numerals is given followed by four groups of symbol/letter combination letters [A], [B], [C] and [D]. Numerals are to be coded as per the codes and conditions. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| You have to find out which of the combinations [A], [B], [C] and [D] is correct and indicate your answer accordingly. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1. If the first digit as well as the last digit is odd both are to be coded as 'X'. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2. If the first digit as well as the last digit is even, both are to be coded as '' | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3. If the last digit is '0'. it is to be coded as #. |
| Direction: In the following question, a group of numerals is given followed by four groups of symbol/letter combination letters [A], [B], [C] and [D]. Numerals are to be coded as per the codes and conditions. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| You have to find out which of the combinations [A], [B], [C] and [D] is correct and indicate your answer accordingly. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1. If the first digit as well as the last digit is odd both are to be coded as 'X'. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2. If the first digit as well as the last digit is even, both are to be coded as '' | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3. If the last digit is '0'. it is to be coded as #. |
| Direction: In the following question, a group of numerals is given followed by four groups of symbol/letter combination letters [A], [B], [C] and [D]. Numerals are to be coded as per the codes and conditions. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| You have to find out which of the combinations [A], [B], [C] and [D] is correct and indicate your answer accordingly. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1. If the first digit as well as the last digit is odd both are to be coded as 'X'. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2. If the first digit as well as the last digit is even, both are to be coded as '' | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3. If the last digit is '0'. it is to be coded as #. |
| Direction: From the alternatives given below. |
| Choose the best option that correctly classifies the four sentences as a: |
| F: Fact: If it relates to a known matter of direct observation, or an existing reality or something known to be true. |
| I: Judgment: If it is an opinion or estimate or anticipation of common sense or intention. |
| I: Inference: if it is a logical conclusion or deduction about something based on the knowledge of facts. |
| [A] Everyday social life is impossible without interpersonal relationships. |
| [B] The root of many misunderstandings has been cited in poor relations among individuals. |
| [C] Assuming the above to be true, social life will be much better if people understand the importance of good interpersonal relations. |
| [D] A study reveals that interpersonal relations and hence life in general can be improved with a little effort on the part of individuals. |
| Direction: From the alternatives given below. |
| Choose the best option that correctly classifies the four sentences as a: |
| F: Fact: If it relates to a known matter of direct observation, or an existing reality or something known to be true. |
| I: Judgment: If it is an opinion or estimate or anticipation of common sense or intention. |
| I: Inference: if it is a logical conclusion or deduction about something based on the knowledge of facts. |
| [A] If democracy is to survive, the people must develop a sense of consumerism. |
| [B] Consumerism has helped improve the quality of goods in certain countries. |
| [C] The protected environment in our country is helping the local manufacturers. |
| ]D] The quality of goods suffers if the manufacturers take undue advantage of this. |
| Direction: From the alternatives given below. |
| Choose the best option that correctly classifies the four sentences as a: |
| F: Fact: If it relates to a known matter of direct observation, or an existing reality or something known to be true. |
| I: Judgment: If it is an opinion or estimate or anticipation of common sense or intention. |
| I: Inference: if it is a logical conclusion or deduction about something based on the knowledge of facts. |
| [A] If democracy is to survive, the people must develop a sense of consumerism. |
| [B] Consumerism environment helped improve the quality of goods in certain countries. |
| [C] The protected environment in our country is helping the local manufactures. |
| [D] The quality of goods suffers if the manufacturers take undue advantage of this. |
| Direction: Question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the best options which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements. |
| [A] Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment. |
| [B] Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to wealth. |
| [C] Traffic congestion is hazardous to health. |
| [D] Some traffic congestion does not cause increase carbon monoxide. |
| [E] Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health. |
| Direction: Question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the best options which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements. |
| [A] MBAs are in great demand. |
| [B] Samrat and Akshita are in great demand |
| [C] Samrat is in great demand. |
| [D] Samrat and Akshita are MBAs. |
| Direction: Question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the best options which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements. |
| [A] All software companies employ knowledge workers. |
| [B] InfoTech employees are knowledge workers. |
| [C] InfoTech is a software company. |
| [D] Some software companies employee knowledge workers. |
| [E] InfoTech employs only knowledge workers. |
| Direction: Read the following information carefully to choose best option for the question: |
| A. 'L%M means that M is brother of L. |
| B. 'L×M' means that L is mother of M. |
| C. 'L-M' means that L is the sister of M. |
| D. 'L=M' means that M is father of L. |
| Which of the following means 'I' is the nephew of Q? |
| 1. Q%J=| |
| 2. Q÷M x B%| |
| 3. C÷|= B% Q |
| Direction: Read the following information carefully to choose best option for the question: |
| A. 'L%M means that M is brother of L. |
| B. 'L×M' means that L is mother of M. |
| C. 'L-M' means that L is the sister of M. |
| D. 'L=M' means that M is father of L. |
means that A is the father of B, 'A * B' means that A is the mother of B, 'A @ B' means that A is the wife of B, then which of the following means that M is the grandmother of N?
| Direction: The question contains two statements numbered I and II. |
| You have to decide whether the information provided in the statement are sufficient to answer the question. |
| Read both the statement and give your answer as: |
| Answer (1) If the information in the statement I alone are sufficient to answer the questions. |
| Answer (2) If the information in the statement II alone are sufficient to answer the questions. |
| Answer (3) If the information either in the statement I alone or in statement II alone are sufficient to answer the questions. |
| Answer (4) If the information even in both statement I and II together are not sufficient to answer the Questions. |
| Can a democratic system operate without an effective opposition? |
| I- The opposition is indispensable. |
| II- A good politician always learns more from his opponents than from his fervent supporters. |
| Direction: The question contains two statements numbered I and II. |
| You have to decide whether the information provided in the statement are sufficient to answer the question. |
| Read both the statement and give your answer as: |
| Answer (1) If the information in the statement I alone are sufficient to answer the questions. |
| Answer (2) If the information in the statement II alone are sufficient to answer the questions. |
| Answer (3) If the information either in the statement I alone or in statement II alone are sufficient to answer the questions. |
| Answer (4) If the information even in both statement I and II together are not sufficient to answer the Questions. |
| Do habits make men's life rigid? |
| I. It is out of habit that people envy others. |
| II. Men become slave of habits. |
| Direction: The question contains two statements numbered I and II. |
| You have to decide whether the information provided in the statement are sufficient to answer the question. |
| Read both the statement and give your answer as: |
| Answer (1) If the information in the statement I alone are sufficient to answer the questions. |
| Answer (2) If the information in the statement II alone are sufficient to answer the questions. |
| Answer (3) If the information either in the statement I alone or in statement II alone are sufficient to answer the questions. |
| Answer (4) If the information even in both statement I and II together are not sufficient to answer the Questions. |
| Does intelligent predict the child's ability to learn? |
| I. Intelligence is unaffected by bad teaching or dull home environment. |
| II. Children from poor home backgrounds do not do well in their school-work. |
| Direction: In the following question some capital alphabets are written in a row, below them their coding has been given. In the question, a particular word has been coded in a particular manner using codes as given below the capital letters. |
| You have to understand the pattern of coding and have to answer the question asked subsequently. |
 |
| Direction: In the following question some capital alphabets are written in a row, below them their coding has been given. In the question, a particular word has been coded in a particular manner using codes as given below the capital letters. |
| You have to understand the pattern of coding and have to answer the question asked subsequently. |
| |
| Direction: In the following question some capital alphabets are written in a row, below them their coding has been given. In the question, a particular word has been coded in a particular manner using codes as given below the capital letters. |
| You have to understand the pattern of coding and have to answer the question asked subsequently. |
| |
| Direction: The question contains two statements and two conclusions numbered I and II. |
| You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements. |
| Answer (1) If only conclusion I follows. |
| Answer (2) If only conclusion II follows. |
| Answer (3) If neither I nor II follows. |
| Answer (1) If both I and II follows. |
| I. Some players are singers. |
| II. All singers are tall. |
| Conclusions: |
| I. Some players are tall. |
| II. All players are tall. |
| Direction: The question contains two statements and two conclusions numbered I and II. |
| You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements. |
| Answer (1) If only conclusion I follows. |
| Answer (2) If only conclusion II follows. |
| Answer (3) If neither I nor II follows. |
| Answer (1) If both I and II follows. |
| I. Some vegetables are fruits. |
| II. No fruit is black. |
| Conclusions: |
| I. Some fruits are vegetables. |
| II. No vegetables is black. |
You need to login to perform this action.
You will be redirected in
3 sec
