| Each question consists of legal principle(s) (here-in-after referred to as 'principle') and facts. Such proposition may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. Principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Only one of the alternatives, i.e. [a], [b], [c] or [d] is the most reasonable conclusion. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the principles that are given herein below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your ability in legal aptitude, study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason. |
| Principle Acceptance of proposal must be the exact mirror image of the proposal. |
| Facts 'A' made a proposal to 'B' to sell a chair for ` 500. 'B' is desirous of buying the said chair for ` 400. |
A) 'B' has accepted the proposal of 'A'.
B) 'B' has not accepted the proposal of 'A'.
C) It is not clear if 'B' has accepted the proposal of 'A'.
D) It is not clear whether 'A' made a proposal to 'B'.
Correct Answer: B
Solution :
Sol. [b] According to the principle, acceptance of a proposal is possible only when it is the exact mirror image of the proposal. Here, A's proposal of selling the chair at ` 500 do not matches B's desire who wants to buy it at ` 400, therefore there is no acceptance.
You need to login to perform this action.
You will be redirected in
3 sec
