|Directions: From the four options given, shade the appropriate correct option in the space provided for it on the OMR Answer Sheet.|
A) State of Maharashtra v/s Prafull B. Desai
B) Paramjit Kaur v/s State of Punjab
C) Pappu Yadav v/s State of Bihar
D) Bachan Singh v/s State of Punjab
Correct Answer: A
Solution :Ans. In a path breaking development, the Supreme Court held in the case of State of Maharashtra v. Praful Desai, that a trial judge could record evidence of witnesses staying abroad through video conferencing. Interpreting Section 273 of the Criminal Procedure Code in the light of technological advancements, a bench comprising Justice S N Variava and Justice B N Agrwal said recording of evidence through video conferencing would be perfectly legal.
You need to login to perform this action.
You will be redirected in 3 sec