Notes - Miscellaneous Topics
Category : UPSC
Miscellaneous Topics
Introduction
Miscelleneous chapter consists many different kinds of topics that are not connected and do not easily from a group and are of different nature. In Likewise, different topics for examples planning commission/NITI Aayog, Finance Commission, Election Commision, National Commission, UPSC, and many more given in the chart below are covered in this chapter.
Planning Commision
NITI Aayog
The Government of India has replaced Planning Commission with a new institution named NITI Aayog (National Institution for Transforming India).
The institution will serve as 'Think Tank' of the Government - a directional and policy dynamo.
NITI Aayog will provide Governments at the Central and State Levels with relevant strategic and technical advice across the spectrum of key elements of policy, which includes matters of national and international importance on the economic front, dissemination of best practices from within the country as well as from other nations, the infusion of new policy ideas and specific issue-based support.
Composition
NITI Aayog will have Prime Minister as its chairman, one Vice-Chairman cum chief-executive officer, 3 full time members and 2 part time members, apart from 4 Central
Government ministers.
NITI Aayog (National Institution for Transforming India)
Present members of NITI Aayog
Chairperson |
Vice ChairPerson |
Full-Time Members |
Ex-officio Members |
Special Invites |
Chief Executive Officer |
Shri Narendra Modi, Hon?nle Prime Minister |
Shri Arvind Panagariya |
Shri Bibek Debroy. Shri V.K. Saraswati. Prof. Ramesh Chand |
Shri Rajnath Singh, Minister of Home Affairs. Shri Arun Jaitley, Minister of Finance; Minister of Corporate Affairs; and Minister of Information and Broadcasting. Shri Suresh Prabhu, Minister of Railways. Shri Radha Mohan Singh, Minister of Agriculture. |
Shri Nitin Gadkari, Minister of Road Transport and Highways; and Minister of Shipping. Shri Thawar Chand Gehlot, Minister of Social Justice and Empowerment.
|
Shri Amitabh Kant |
Difference between Planning Commission and NITI Aayog
S. No |
Points of Difference |
NITI Aayog |
Planning Commission |
1. |
Financial clout |
To be an advisory body, or a think-tank. The powers to allocate fund vested in the finance ministry. |
Enjoyed the powers to allocate funds to ministries and state governments |
2. |
Full ? time members |
Three full-time members. |
Had eight full-time members |
3. |
States? role |
Includes the Chief Ministers of all States and the Lieutenant Governors of all Union territories in its Governing Council, devolving more power to the States of the Union. |
States' role was limited to the National Development Council and annual interaction during plan meetings |
4. |
Member secretary |
To be known as the CEO and to be appointed by the Prime Minister |
Secretaries or member secretaries were appointed through the usual process |
5. |
Part - time members |
To have a number of part time member, depending on the need from time to time |
Full Planning Commission had no provision for part time members |
6. |
Constitution |
Governing Council has state Chief Ministers and lieutenant governors. |
The Commission reported to National Development Council that had State Chief Ministers and lieutenant governors. |
7. |
Organization |
New posts of CEO, of secretary rank, and vice Chairperson. Will also have two full-time members and part-time members as per need. Four cabinet ministers will serve as ex-officio members. |
Had deputy chairperson, a member secretary and 8 full time members. |
8. |
Participation |
Consulting states while making policy and deciding on funds allocation. Final policy would be a result of that. |
Policy was formed by the commission and states were then consulted about allocation of funds. |
9. |
Allocation |
No power to allocate funds |
Had power to decide allocation of government funds for various programs at national and state levels. |
10. |
Nature |
NITI is a think-tank and does not have the power to impose policies. |
Imposed policies on states and tied allocation of funds with projects it approved. |
National Development Council (NDC)
Composition
Objectives
Functions
STAGES IN MAKING OF A PLAN
Drafting of Five-Year Plan
Prepared by the Planning Commission |
\[\downarrow \] |
Submitted to Union Cabinet for approval |
\[\downarrow \] |
Placed before the NDC for its acceptance |
\[\downarrow \] |
Presented to the Parliament |
\[\downarrow \] |
Emerges as the official plan |
\[\downarrow \] |
Published in the official gazette |
Finance Commission
Composition
Functions
Finance Commission |
Chairman |
Operational Duration |
First |
K. C. Neogy |
1952-57 |
Second |
K. Santhanam |
1957-62 |
Third |
A. K. Chanda |
1962-66 |
Fourth |
P. V. Rajamannar |
1966-69 |
Fifth |
Mahaveer Tyagi |
1969-74 |
Sixth |
K. Brahmananda Reddy |
1974-79 |
Seventh |
J. M. Shelat |
1979-84 |
Eighth |
Y. B. Chavan |
1984-89 |
Ninth |
N. K. P. Salve |
1989-95 |
Tenth |
K. C. Pant |
1995-2000 |
Eleventh |
A. M. Khusro |
2000-2005 |
Twelfth |
C. Rangarajan |
2005-2010 |
Thirteenth |
Dr. Vijay L. Kelkar |
2010-2015 |
Fourteenth |
Dr. Y. V Reddy |
2015-2020 |
Financial Stability and Development Council
Election Commission
Composition (Article 324)
Independence
(i) Security of tenure i.e. Chief Election Commissioner is removed in same manner and on the same grounds as a judge of the Supreme Court. Parliament with special majority, either on the ground of proved misbehavior or incapacity. Thus, he does not hold his office till the pleasure of the President, though appointed by the President.
(ii) Service conditions cannot be varied to his disadvantage after his appointment.
(iii) Other election commissioner or a regional commissioner removed only on the recommendation of the chief Election Commissioner.
Powers and Functions
In details, these powers and functions are:
List of Chief Election Commissioners |
|||
|
Name |
Took Office |
Left Office |
1. |
Sukumar Sen |
21 March 1950 |
19 December 1958 |
2. |
Kalyan Sundaram |
20 December 1958 |
30 September 1967 |
3. |
S. P. Sen Verma |
1 October 1967 |
30 September 1972 |
4. |
Nagendra Singh |
1 October 1972 |
6 February 1973 |
5. |
T. Swaminathan |
7 February 1973 |
17 June 1977 |
6. |
S.L. Shakdhar |
18 June 1977 |
17 June 1982 |
7. |
R.K. Trivedi |
18 June 1982 |
31 December 1985 |
8. |
R.V.S. Peri Sastri |
1 January 1986 |
25 November 1990 |
9. |
V.S. Ramadevi |
26 November 1990 |
11 December 1990 |
10. |
T.N. Seshan |
12 December 1990 |
11 December 1996 |
11. |
M.S. Gill |
12 December 1996 |
13 June 2001 |
12. |
J.M. Lyngdoh |
14 June 2001 |
7 February 2004 |
13. |
T.S. Krishnamurthy |
8 February 2004 |
15 May 2005 |
14. |
B.B. Tandon |
16 May 2005 |
29 June 2006 |
15. |
N. Gopalaswami |
30 June 2006 |
20 April 2009 |
16. |
Navin Chawla |
21 April 2009 |
29 July 2010 |
17. |
S.Y. Quraishi |
30 July 2010 |
10 June 2012 |
18. |
V.S. Sampath |
11 June 2012 |
15 January 2015 |
19. |
H.S. Brahma |
16 January 2015 |
18 April 2015 |
20. |
Nasim Zaidi |
19 April 2015 |
Incumbent |
16th LOK SABHA ELECTION, 2014
Major Facts-
|
States |
NDA |
UPA |
Other |
1. |
Bihar |
31 |
7 |
2 |
2. |
NCT of Delhi |
7 |
0 |
0 |
3. |
Haryana |
7 |
1 |
2 |
4. |
Himachal Pradesh |
4 |
0 |
0 |
5. |
Jammu and Kashmir |
3 |
0 |
3 |
6. |
Madhya Pradesh |
27 |
2 |
0 |
7. |
Punjab |
6 |
3 |
4 |
8. |
Utter Pradesh |
73 |
2 |
5 |
9. |
Uttarakhand |
5 |
0 |
0 |
10. |
Arunachal Pradesh |
1 |
0 |
0 |
11. |
Assam |
7 |
3 |
4 |
12. |
Chattisgarh |
10 |
1 |
0 |
13. |
Jharkhand |
13 |
1 |
0 |
14. |
Manipur |
0 |
2 |
0 |
15. |
Meghalaya |
1 |
1 |
0 |
16. |
Mizoram |
0 |
1 |
0 |
17. |
Nagaland |
1 |
0 |
0 |
18. |
Odisha |
1 |
0 |
20 |
19. |
Sikkim |
0 |
0 |
1 |
20. |
Tripura |
0 |
0 |
2 |
21. |
West Bengal |
2 |
4 |
36 |
22. |
Andhra Pradesh |
19 |
2 |
21 |
23. |
Karnataka |
17 |
9 |
2 |
24. |
Kerala |
0 |
10 |
10 |
25. |
Tamil Nadu |
02 |
00 |
37 |
26. |
Goa |
02 |
00 |
00 |
27. |
Gujarat |
26 |
00 |
00 |
28. |
Maharashtra |
42 |
06 |
00 |
29. |
Rajasthan |
25 |
00 |
00 |
New Happenging in this Election
(1) NOTA - NOTA (None of the above) was a category introduced this time for voters who could raise their voice not to choose any representative if they dislike any of the above.
(2) Spread Out - This was the longest tenured election that lasted in India.
(3) Aam Aadmi Party - A new born party become a major challenge to BJP and Congress reaching a National Support base for the first time.
(4) BJP won majority (282 seats) of the total seats declaring a clear single party majority win with a lowest vote share of 31 % of total valid vote casted. But this win marked as a least percentage win as compared to the Previous years.
The previous lowest vote share for a single party major was in 1967, when congress won 283 out of 520 seats with 40.8% of total valid votes polled.
Voters Turn out
East India-75%
South India - 72%
North India - 60%
West India-62%
List of member of the 16th Lok Sabha.
Leader of the House in the Rajya Sabha - Arun Jaitley |
· Secretary General - P. Sreedharan.
(Assembly Election 2017) |
||
Uttar Pradesh |
||
Party |
Seats Won |
Total Seats |
BJP |
312 |
403 |
SP |
47 |
|
INC |
07 |
|
BSP |
19 |
|
RLD |
1 |
|
Others |
17 |
|
Punjab |
||
Party |
Seats Won |
Total Seats |
INC |
77 |
117 |
AAP |
20 |
|
SAD |
15 |
|
BJP |
03 |
|
Others |
02 |
|
Goa |
||
Party |
Seats Won |
Total Seats |
INC |
17 |
40 |
BJP |
13 |
|
MGP |
03 |
|
Others |
07 |
|
Uttarakhand |
||
Party |
Seats Won |
Total Seats |
BJP |
57 |
70 |
INC |
11 |
|
Others |
2 |
|
Manipur |
||
Party |
Seats Won |
Total Seats |
INC |
28 |
60 |
BJP |
21 |
|
AITC |
01 |
|
Others |
10 |
About NOTA
The Elevtion Commission of India asked the Supreme Court that to offer the vote na ‘NOTA’ option at the ballot as its would give voters the freedom of not selecting any undeserving candidate. The Government was not in favour of such an idea. ‘The people’s Union for civil Liberties’ which is an NGO, filed a PIL to favour NOTA. Finally on 27th September 2013, the right to register a ‘NOTA. Finally on 27th September 2013, the right to register a ‘NOTA’ vote in elections was applied by the supreme court of India, which then ordered the election commission that then ordered the election Commission that all voting machines should be provided with a NOTA button so as to give voters the option to choose ‘None of the above’. The Symbol for NOTA, a ballot paper with a black cross, is designed by National Institute of Design, Ahmedabad. In the Indian general election, 2014, NOTA polled 1.1% of the votes, counting to over 6 million.
Political Parties
Political Party is a group of persons who agree on some ideology and seek to capture the power and form the government on the basis of collective leadership.
Type of Party System in India - Multi Party System
Functions-
(i) Recruitment of leaders.
(ii) To congest election
(iii) Formation of government
(iv) Formulation of laws when in power.
(v) Role of oppositions
(vi) Shaping public opinion.
(vii) Provide politely stability.
Category of Political Party in India:
Swaraj India,s Common Symbols & Delhi MCD Election 2017
Yogendra Yadav-led Swaraj India’s plea for a common symbol in the upcoming MCD polls was dismissed by the Delhi High Court on 29th March 2017.
The high court dismissed the party’s plea, saying since the electronic voting machines would now carry photographs of the candidates, it would not be put to any disadvantages if there was no common symbol.
As the plea was field after several steps in the electoral process had started, it was “very late in the day for the court to interfere,” Justice Hima Kohli noted.
Earlier, on 23 March, the high court had asked the Delhi poll panel whether it intends to give a common symbol to political parties like yogendra yadav-led Swaraj India, which are registered but unrecognized.
The court had posed the query to the Commission after senior advocate Shanti Bhushan, appearing for Swaraj India, submitted that a letter was sent to the Delhi government to consider amending the rules for allotment the common the symbols to registered but un recognized political parties.
Bhushan had made the submissions during arguments on a plea challenging the Commision’s decision not to allot a common symbols to Swaraj India to contest the upcoming MCD polls.
Swaraj India claimed the Non-allotment of a common symbol to a registered party amounted to discrimination as the Aam Aadmi party was granted such a Relief when it have contested for the first time.
Swaraj India has sought quashing of the panel’s 14 March, 2017 notification and an April 2016 order which said the nominees of such parties would be treated as independent candidates for allotment of symbols.
Swaraj India was floated in October last year by yadav and advocate Prashant Bhusan, who were expelled from the AAP after the questioned Arvind Kejriwal’s leadership. The party, registered by the Election Commission of India (ECI) in February 2017, has contended that the Delhi symbols order was “wholly illegal, arbitrary, capricious, unreasonable and selective, destroying the very fairness of the proposed electoral process itself”.
It has said that providing it a common symbol will create a level playing field among all the party’s request for a common symbol.
The party has contended that the panel rejected it request for a symbol despite a provision in the ECI rules to provide a common symbol to a registered but unrecognised political party like Swaraj India, which is set to make its election debute in the 23 April MCD polls.
The party said the ECI’s Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) (Amendment) Order allows newly registered parties to have a common symbol for all their candidates for contesting their first election.
The party has claimed that states like Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Haryana, West Bengal, Kerala, Sikkim and Tripura follow the rule.
Pressure Groups
Types of Pressure Group in India
Distinction between Political Parties and Presure Groups |
|
Political Parties |
Pressure Groups |
They are political as they are part of political system. |
They are non-political as they are part of social system. |
They contest elections & form either the government or the opposition. |
They do not contest elections, nor do they participate in the working of the government |
They seek political power and as such their object is general. |
They seek specific objects
|
They are outward oriented, too formal, and too open. |
They are inward-oriented, too secretive. |
Attorney-General of India (Article 76)
Official Language of the Union (Article 343)
The; official language of the IJnion shall be Hindi in Devenagiri script. The form of numerals to be used for the purposes of the Union shall be the international form of Indian numerals.
Not with standing anything in clause(l), for a period of fifteen years from the commencement of this Constitution, the English language shall continue to be used for all the official purposes of the Union for which it was being used imediately before such commencement:
Provided that the president may, during the said period, by order authorize the use of the Hindi language in addition to the English language and of the Devanagiri international form of Indian numerals for any of the official purpose of the union.
Not with standing anything in this Article, Parliament may by, law provide for the use, after the said period of fifteen years, of:
(a) the English language or,
(b) the Devanagri form of numerals for such purposes as may be specified in law.
Comptroller and Auditor-General of India
(a) All bodies and authorities substantially financed from the Central or state revenues
(b) Government companies; and
(c) Other corporations and bodies, when so required by related laws.
The CAG submits three audit reports to the president-audit report on appropriation accounts, audit report on finance accounts, and audit report before on public undertakings.
The President lays these reports before both the Houses of Parliament. After this, the Public Accounts Committee examines them and reports its findings to the Parliament.
National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled
(I) The National Commission for Scheduled Castes (SCs)
It is a constitutional body in the sense that it is directly established by Article 338 of the Constitution. On the other hand, the other national commissions like the National Commission for Women (1992), the National Commission for Minorities (1993), the national Commission for Backward Classes (1993), the National Human Rights Commission (1993) and the National Commission for protection of Child Rights (2007) are statutory bodies in the sense that they are established by acts of the Parliament.
(II) National Commission for Scheduled Tribes like the National Commission for Schedules Castes (SCs), the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (STs) is also a constitutional body in the sense that it is directly established by Article 338-A of the Constitution.
(II) National Commission for Scheduled Tribes like the National Commission for Schedules Castes (SCs), the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (STs) is also a constitutional body in the sense that it is directly established by Article 338-A of the Constitution.
The President places all such reports before the Parliament. The President also forwards any report of the Commission pertaining to a state government to the state governor. The governor places it before the state legislature.
National Commission for Backward Classes
A Statutory Body under the Ministry of Social Justice& Empowerment
The Supreme Court of India in its Judgment dated 16.11.1992 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 930 of 1990 - Indra Sawhney & Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors., reported in (1992) Supp. 3 SCC 217 directed the Govt. of India, State Governments and Union Territory Administrations to constitute a permanent body in the nature of a Commission or Tribunal for entertaining, examining and recommending upon requests for inclusion and complaints of over-inclusion and under-inclusion in the list of OBCs.
The Act came into effect on the 2nd April, 1993. Section 3 of the Act provides that the Commission shall consist of five Members, comprising of a Chairperson who is or has been a judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court; a social scientist; two persons, who have special knowledge in matters relating to backward classes; and a Member-Secretary, who is or has been an officer of the Central Government in the rank of a Secretary to the Government of India.
Recently, the NCBC has demanded that the government introduce quotas for OBCs in private sector.
National Commission for Minorities
The Union Government set up the National Commission for Minorities (NCM) under the National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992. Five religious communities, viz; Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists and Zoroastrians (Parsis) have been notified as minority communities by the Union Government. Further vide notification detail 27th Jan 2014, Jains have also been notified as minority community.
The Commission has one Chairperson and five Members represented five minority communities.
Andhra Pradesh, Assam , Bihar, Chattisgarh, Delhi , Jharkhand, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal have also set up State Minorities Commissions in their respective States. Their offices are located in the State capitals. The functions of these Commissions, inter-alia, are to safeguard and protect the interests of minorities provided in the Constitution and laws enacted by Parliament and the State Legislatures.
National Commission for Women (NCW)
NCW is a statutory body for women established in 1992 by Government of India as per provisions made in National Commission for Women Act, 1990.
Composition of Commission
The commission consists of
Functions of the Commission
(a) deprivation of women's rights.
(b) non-implementation of laws enacted to provide protection to women and also to achieve the objective of equality and development.
(c) non-compliance of policy decisions, guidelines or instructions aimed at mitigating hardships and ensuring welfare and providing relief to women and take up the issues arising out of such matters with appropriate authorities;
National Human Rights Commission (NHRC)
The National Human Rights Commission is an expression of India's concern for the protection and promotion of human rights. It came into being in, October 1993. In terms of Section 2 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 (hereafter referred to as 'the Act'), "human rights" means the rights relating to life, liberty, equality and dignity of the individual guaranteed under the Constitution or embodied in the International Covenants and enforceable by courts in India.
"International Covenants" means the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on the 16th December, 1966.
The Commission performs all or any of the following functions, namely
(a) Inquire, on its own initiative or on a petition presented to it by a victim or any person on his behalf, into complaint of-
(i) Violation of human rights or abetment or
(b) Intervene in any proceeding involving any allegation of violation of human rights pending before a court with the approval of such court.
(c) Visit, under intimation to the State Government, any jailor any other institution under the control of the State Government. Where persons are detained or lodged for purposes of treatment, reformation or protection to study the living condition of the inmates and make recommendations thereon.
(d) Review the safeguards by or under the Constitution or any law for the time being in force for the protection of human rights and recommend measures for their effective implementation.
(e) Review the factors, including acts of terrorism that inhibit the enjoyment of human rights and recommend appropriate remedial measures.
(f) Study treaties and other international instruments on human rights and make recommendations for their effective implementation.
(g) Undertake and promote research in the field of human rights.
(h) Spread human rights literacy among various sections of society and promote awareness of the safeguards available for the protection of these rights through publications, the media, seminars and other available means.
(i) Encourage the efforts of non-Government organisations and institutions working in the field of human rights.
(j) Such other functions as it may consider necessary for the promotion of human rights
While inquiring into complaints under the Act, the Commission shall have all the powers of a civil court trying a suit under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and in particular the following.
(a) Summoning and enforcing the attendance of witnesses and examining them on oath;
(b) discovery and production of any document;
(c) receiving evidence on affidavits;
(d) requisitioning any public record or copy there of from any court of office;
(e) issuing commissions for the examination of witnesses or documents;
(f) any other matter which may be prescribed.
The autonomy of the Commission derives, inter-alia, from the method of appointing its Chairperson and Members, their fixity of tenure, and statutory guarantees thereto, the status they have been accorded and the manner in which the staff responsible to the Commission - including its investigative agency – are appointed and conduct themselves. The financial autonomy of the Commission is spelt out in Section 32 if the Act.
The Chairperson and Members of the Commission are appointed by the President on the basis of recommendations of a Committee comprising the Prime Minister as the Chairperson, the Speaker of Lok Sabha, the Home Minister, the leaders of the opposition in the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha and the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha as Members.
Inquiring into complaints is one of the major activities of the Commission. In several instances individual complaints have led the Commission to the generic issues involved in violation of rights, and enabled it to move the concerned authorities for systemic improvements. However, the Commission also actively seeks out issues in human rights which are of significance, either suo motu, or when brought to its notice by the civil society, the media, concerned citizens, or expert advisers. Its focus is the strengthen the extension of human rights to all sections of society, in particular, the vulnerable groups.
The commission's purview covers the entire range of civil and political, as well as economic, social and cultural rights. Areas facing terrorism and insurgency, custodial death, rape and torture, reform of the police, prisons, and other institutions such as juvenile homes, mental hospitals and shelters for women have been given special attention. The Commission has urged the provision of primary health facilities to ensure maternal and child welfare essential to a life with dignity, basic needs such as potable drinking water, food and nutrition, and highlighted fundamental questions of equity and justice to the less privileged, namely the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and the prevention of atrocities perpet. Acted against them. Rights of the disabled, access to public services, displacement of populations and especially of tribals by mega projects, food scarcity and allegation of death by starvation, rights of the child, rights of women subjected to violence, sexual harassment and discrimination, and rights of minorities, have been the focus of the commission's action on numerous occasions.
Union Public Service Commission (Part XIV, Article 315-323)
Article 315 - Public Service Commissions for Union and states. |
Article 316 - Recruitment and conditions of service of persons serving the Union or a state |
Article 317 - Removal and suspension of a member of Public Service Commission |
Article 319 - Prohibition as to the holding of offices by members of the Commission on ceasing to be such members. |
Article 320 - Functions of Public Service Commission |
Article 321 - To extend functions of public service commission |
Article 323 - Reports of Public Service Commissions |
Composition
Removal
Independence
Functions
Role
Staff Selection Commission
Responsible for:
Law Commission
Law Commission of India is a non-statutory body constituted by the Government of India from time to time. The Commission was originally constituted in 1955 and is reconstituted every 3 years. The Reports of the low commission are considered by Ministry of low in consultation with the concerned administrative Ministries and are submitted to parliament form time to time.
First |
1955-1958 |
MC Setalvad |
Second |
1958-1961 |
Justice TV Venkatarama |
Aiyar
|
|
|
Third |
1961-1964 |
Justice JL Kapur |
Fourth |
1964-1968 |
Justice JL Kapur |
Fifth |
1968-1971 |
KVK Sundaram, ICS |
Sixth |
1971 -1974 |
Justice Dr PB Gajendragadkar |
Seventh |
1974-1977 |
Justice Dr PB Gajendragadkar |
Eighth |
1977-1979 |
Justice HR Khanna |
Ninth |
1979-1980 |
Justice PV Dixit |
Tenth |
1981-1985 |
Justice KK Mathew |
Eleventh |
1985-1988 |
Justice DA Desai |
Twelfth |
1988-1991 |
Justice MP Thakkar |
Thirteenth |
1991-1994 |
Justice KN Singh |
Fourteenth |
1995-1997 |
Justice K Jayachandra Reddy |
Fifteenth |
1997-2000 |
Justice BP Jeevan Reddy |
Sixteenth |
2000-2001 |
Justice BP Jeevan Reddy |
Seventeenth |
2003-2006 |
Justice M Jagannadha Rao |
Eighteenth |
2006-2009 |
Justice AR Lakshmanan |
Nineteenth |
2009-2012 |
Justice PV Reddy |
Twentieth |
2012-2015 |
DK Jain |
21th Law commission
(a) Review/Repeal of obsolete laws.
(b) Law and Poverty:-
Examine the laws which affect the poor and carry out post -audit for socio-economic
(c) Simplification of procedure to reduce and eliminate technicalities and devices for delay so that it operates not as an end in itself but as a means of achieving justice.
(d) Examine existing laws in the light of DPSP & to suggest ways of improvement and reform.
(e) Examine existing laws with a view for promoting gender equality and suggesting amendments thereto.
(f) Revise the central Acts to remove anomalies, ambiguities and inequities,
(g) Consider and convey to the Government its views on low and judicial administration related subjects, specifically referred to it through Ministry of Law and Justice:
(h) Consider the requests for providing research to any foreign countries.
(i) Examine the input of globalization on food security, unemployment and recommend measures for the protection of interests of the marginalized.
(j) Keep under review the system of judicial administration to ensure that it is responsive to the reasonable demands of the times.
Evolution of the Civil Services in India
The beginning of a more organised form of the Civil Services started when Lord Cornwallis in 1793, started covenanted services. Indians were virtually disallowed to join these services and only lower posts were kept open for the Indians. Another serious effort was made by Lord Wellesley, who established a college at Fort William to train civil servants in India for a period of 3 years before assigning them any administrative duties.
In 1854 lord Macaulay Committee recommended for conducting exams for recruitment into the Civil Service. Consequently, first ever competitive exam was held in 1855 in London. Indians could not find their way into Indian Civil Services due to several hurdles like the entry age was kept very low, exams were not conducted in India, cost of living in London was relatively expensive.
In 1864, Satyendranath Tagore became the first Indian to qualify for the covenanted Civil Services. The British Parliament passed an Act in 1870, authorising the appointment of any Indian (of proved merit and ability) to any office or the Civil Services without reference to the Act of 1861, which reserved specific appointments to the covenanted service.
Later on various committees (Aitchison Committee, Islington Committee, Lee Committee, etc.) recommended for increasing the representation of Indians in Civil Services. As provided in Government of India Act, 1919 (later recommended by the Lee Commission also) the Federal Public Service Commission was set-up in 1926. This Commission went on to become the Union Public Service Commission after Independence.
Three types of services viz. All India Services Central Services and State Services were created. The original Constitution of India had recognised only two All India Services namely Indian Administrative Service and Indian Police Service. The Indian Administrative Service replaced the former Indian Civil Service and similarly in 1951, Indian Police Service was constituted in place of the Indian Police. In 1966, another All India Service i.e. the Indian Forest Service was created.
Presently, there are three all India Civil Services namely
An All India Service can be created by parliament under Article 312 on the basis of a resolution passed by Rajya Sabha. Thus an All India Service can be created only by an act of parliament and not by the resolution of Rajya Sabha, though such a resolution is must before enacting such an Act.
Constitutional Safeguards to Civil Servants
(1) There shall be no removal by subordinate authority. Removing authority can be of coordinate rank/higher than the appointing authority.
(2) Reasonable opportunity to defend himself.
Administrative Reforms
The nodal agency of the Government for administrative reforms as well as redressel of public grievances relating to the states and Central Government agencies is the Department of Administrative Reforms and Public Grievances (DARPG). The Department comes under the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions. The mission of the department is to foster excellence in governance and pursuit of administrative reforms through improvements in Government structures, promoting citizen centric governance with emphasis on grievance redressel, innovations in e-governance and documentation and dissemination of best practices.
ARC at a Glance |
||
Appointed by |
Government of India. |
|
Objectives |
Recommendations for reforming Indian public administration system. |
|
Two commission |
First ARC |
Second ARC |
|
· Set up in Jan. 1966. Initially chaired by Morarji R Desai. · Later chaired by K. Hanumanthaiya. · Submitted 20 reports contained 537 major recommandations. |
· Set up in Aug 2005. · Initially chaired by Mr. Veerappal Moily. · Later chaired by Ramachandran. · Submitted 15 reports. |
Citizens’ Charter
Governance
Governance generally means the act or process of governing, specifically authoritative direction and control. The World Bank document, "Governance and Development defines governance as 'the manner in which power is exercised in management of a country's economic and social resources for development'.
Good Governance is about making sure that the exercise of power by the government helps improve quality of life enjoyed by all citizens. Good governance is not only for a type of government and its related political values but also for certain kinds of additional components, it implies government that is democratically organized within a democratic political culture and with efficient administrative organizations, plus the right policies. At the constitutional level, good governance requires change that will strengthen the rule of law and decentralise political authority. At the political and organizational level, good governance requires three at tributes-political pluralism, opportunities for extensive participation and incorruptibility in the use of public powers and offices by servants of the state.
The UNDP defined good governance as - "the exercise of political, economic and administrative authority to manage a nation's affairs at all levels. It comprises the mechanism, process and institutions, through which citizen and group articulate their interests, exercise their legal rights, met their obligations and mediate their differences."
Table 1: INDICATORS OF QUALITY OF GOVERNANCE |
||||||
Governance Performance Index |
||||||
Dimensions |
Infrastructure service delivery |
Social service Delivery
|
Fiscal Performance |
Law & Order |
Judicial Service Delivery |
Quality of Legislature |
Water supply & sanitation |
Health |
Development Expenditure as percentage of total expenditure |
Rate of violent crimes |
Trials completed in 1-3 years as % of total trails in all courts. |
Proportion of MLA?s with serious criminal charges pending (%) |
|
Indicators |
Per captia power consumption |
Education |
Own Revenve GSDP Ratio |
Complaints registered against police per person |
Proportion of women MLA?s (%) |
|
Road length per square Kilometer |
|
|
Police strength per lakh population |
Digital E-Governance
In the context of globalization, the recent conceptualization of ‘e-governance or digital’ governance’s of significance in administrative reforms. Drawn on the latest ICT, the aim of e-governance is to open up government processes and enable greater public access to information. Both digital and e-governance are of recent origin and there is hardly any universally acceptable definition. Digital/e-governance refers to the use of the emerging ICT like the internet, web page, and mobile phones to deliver information and services to citizens. It can include Publication of information about government services on web sites and citizens can download the application forms for these services. It can also deliver services, such as filling of a tax form, renewal of licence, and processing on-line payments as well. The purpose of digital government is to create 'super counters in [the government departments] and eliminate the endless maze citizens have to negotiate in going from door to door, floor to floor, to obtain service'. Appropriate use of various techniques of ICT will usher in a new era in public administration by seeking to make to make the governmental functioning and processes more transparent and accessible.
So e-governance through a technological innovation 'has changed the basic character of governance - its operational methodology, functional style, ideological orientation, even the spirit, heart and soul'. In the developed countries, e-governance is a well-established mode in which governmental services are made available to the citizens through online portals. In India, digital governance has been legalized by the Information Technology Act of 2000. This Act provides:
(a) the filling of any form, application or any other document with any office, authority, body or agency owned or controlled by appropriate government in a particular manner;
(b) the issue or grant of any license, permit, sanction or approval by whatever name called in a particular manner; and
(c) the receipt or payment of money in a particular manner.
(a) reduce the cost of government
(b) increase citizens input into government,
(c) improve public decision-making, and
(d) increase the transparency of government transactions.
Drawn on the ICT, e-governance articulates public administration in a refreshingly new way. However, its application is considerably limited in the public sector simply because e-govemance threatens mass retrenchment of workers involved in government. So, the public sector cannot opt for e-governance to replace people for two reasons. First, access to internet is still limited even in the developed countries. Thus, while transactions through ICT cost less than they are conventional devices, the government has to maintain both the old and new systems to sustain its 'public' character; otherwise. a large portion of me 'people' will remain outside government transactions. Second, downsizing and reducing public sector employment in many countries result in economic hardship of those losing jobs, which, for obvious reasons, has seven political repercussions. Thus, for the leadership, this is not a desirable option unless there is no option available.
In other words, given the obvious adverse consequences of e-governance both in developed and developing countries, its applicability is both uncertain and limited.
The Lokpal and Lokayuktas
The Scandinavian institution of Ombudsman created in Sweden in 1809 is the earliest democratic institution in the world for the redressal of citizens' grievances. The Ombudsman in India s called as Lokpal/Lokayukta.
The idea of creating an anti-corruption ombudsman, in the form of a Lokpal, was first conceptualised in 1968 in the fourth LokSabha. Thereafter in 1971, 1977, 1985, 1989, 1996, 1998 and 2001 efforts were made to enact legislation to create the institution of Lokpal, but these efforts remained unsuccessful.
This has been one of the few pieces of legislation in recent years which has been extensively debated publicly and received in depth parliamentary scrutiny. Before the bill was introduced in Parliament, a joint committee made up of government and civil society representatives had made an attempt to draft the Bill.
The historic Lokpal and Lokayuktas Bill, 2011 passed by Parliament (17th December, 2013 in Rajya Sabha and 18th December, 2013 in Lok Sabha) paves the way for setting up of the institution of Lokpal at the Centre and Lokayuktas in states by law enacted by the respective State Legislatures within year of coming into force of the Act.
Lokpal and Lokayuktas to inquire into allegations of corruption against certain public functionaries and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. The new law provides for a mechanism for dealing with complaints of corruption against public functionaries, including those in high places.
Salient Features of the Act
Special Lokpal Courts
ANTI-DEFECTION LAW
The 52nd Amendment Act of 1985 provided for the disqualification of the members of Parliament and the state legislatures on the ground of defection from one political party to another. For this purpose, it made changes in four articles of the Constitution and added a new schedule (the Tenth Schedule) to the Constitution. This Act is often referred to as the 'Anti-defection Law'.
Later, the 91st amendment act of 2003 made one change in the provisions of the Tenth Schedule. It omitted an exception provision, i.e. disqualification on ground of defection not to apply in case of split.
Provisions of the Act
The Tenth Schedule contains the following provisions with respect to the disqualification of members of parliament and the State Legislatures on the ground of defection:
Members of Political Parties
A member of a house belonging to any political party becomes disqualified for being a member of the house, (a) if he voluntarily gives up his membership of such political party; or (b) if he votes or abstains from voting in such house contrary to any direction issued by his political party without obtaining prior permission of such party and such act has not been condoned by the party-within 15 days.
From the above provisions it is clear that a member elected on a party ticket should continue in the party and obey the party directions.
Independent Members
An independent member of a house (elected without being set up as a candidate by any political party) becomes disqualified to remain a member of the house if he joins any political party after such election.
Nominated Members
A nominated member of a house becomes disqualified for being a member of the house if he joins any political party after the expiry of six months from the date on which he takes his seat in the house. This means that he may join any political party within six months of taking his seat in the house without inviting this disqualification.
The above disqualification on the ground of defection does not apply in the following two cases:
(a) If a member goes out of his party as a result of a merger of the party with another party. A merger takes place when two-thirds of the members of the party have agreed to such merger.
(b) If a member, after being elected as the presiding officer of the house, voluntarily gives up the membership of his party or rejoins it after he ceases to hold that office. This exemption has been provided in view of the dignity and impartiality of this office.
Any question regarding disqualification arising out of defection is to be decided by the presiding officer of the house. Originally, the act provided that the decision of the presiding officer is final and cannot be questioned in any court. The Supreme Court declared this provision as unconstitutional on the ground that it seeks to take away the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and the high courts.
It held that the presiding officer, while deciding a question under the Tenth Schedule, function as a tribunal. Hence, his decision like that of any other tribunal, is subject to judicial review on the grounds of mala fides, perversity. etc. But, the court rejected the contention that the vesting of adjudicatory powers in the presiding officer is by itself invalid on the ground of political bias.
The presiding officer of a house is empowered to make rules to give effect to the provisions of the Tenth Schedule.
All such rules must be placed before the house for 30 days.
The house may approve or modify or disapprove them. Further, he may direct that any willful contravention by any member of such rules may be dealt with in the same manner as a breach of privilege of the house.
According to the rules made so, the presiding officer can take up a defection case only when he receives a complaint from a member of the house. Before taking the final decision, he must give the member (against whom the complaint has been made) a chance to submit his explanation. He may also refer the matter to the committee of privileges for inquiry. Hence, defection has no immediate and automatic effect.
Evaluation of the Act
The Tenth Schedule of the Constitution (which embodies the Anti-defection Law) is designed to prevent the evil or mischief of political defections motivated by the lure of office or material benefits or other similar considerations. It is intended to strengthen the fabric of Indian parliamentary democracy by curbing unprincipled and unethical political defections.
Advantages
The following can be cited as the advantages of the Anti- defection Law:
(a) It provides for greater stability in the body politic by checking the propensity of legislators to change parties.
(b) It facilitates democratic realignment of parties in the legislature by way of merger of parties.
(c) It reduces corruption at the political level as well as non-developmental expenditure incurred on .irregular elections.
(d) It gives, for the first time, a clear-cut constitutional recognition to the existence of political parties.
Criticism
Though the Anti-defection Law been hailed as a bold step towards cleansing our political life and started as new epoch in the political life of the country, it has revealed many lacunae in its operation and failed to prevent defections in toto. It came to be criticised on the following grounds:
The National Green Tribunal has been established on 18th October, 2010 under the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 for effective and expeditious disposal of cases relating to environment protection and conservation of forests and other natural resources including enforcement of any legal right relating to environment and giving relief and compensation for damages to persons and property and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.
It is a specialised body equipped with the necessary expertise to handle environmental disputes involving multi- disciplinary issues. The tribunal shall not be bound by the procedure laid down under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, but shall be guided by principles of natural justice.
The tribunal's dedicated jurisdiction in environmental matters shall provide speedy environmental justice and help reduce the burden of litigation in the higher courts. The tribunal is mandated to make and endeavour for disposal of applications or appeals finally within 6 months of filing of the same. Initially, the NGT is proposed to be set-up at five places of sittings and will follow circuit procedure for making itself more accessible.
New Delhi is the Principal place of sitting of the Tribunal and Bhopal, Pune, Kolkata and Chennai shall be the other four places of sittings of the tribunal.
Members
The sanctioned strength of the tribunal is currently 10 expert members and 10 judicial members, although the act allows for upto 20 of each. The Chairman of the tribunal, who is the administrative head of the tribunal, also serves as a judicial member. Every bench of the tribunal must consist of atleast one expert member and one judicial member. The Chairman of the tribunal is required to be a serving or retired Chief justice of a High Court or a Judge of the Supreme Court of India.
On 18th October, 2010, Justice Lokeshwar ingh Panta became its first Chairman. Currently, it is chaired by Justice Swatanter Kumar since, 20th December, 2012.
You need to login to perform this action.
You will be redirected in
3 sec