Essays

Capital punishment’s defined in the Encarta Encyclopedia as the legal infliction of the death penalty. The death penalty is currently used as punishment for crimes of murder. The State of Florida supports capital punishment and carries it out by electric chair execution. In the case of the death penalty, an individual kills another human and he is punished for it by death. Punishment is supposed to be a temporary penalization for a wrongful action Death is far from temporary. One is to Iearn from one's mistakes. How can the person learn if they are paying for their mistake with their life? In George Andersen's article, Organizing Against the Death Penalty he states. The death penalty is our harshest punishment. It is irrevocable: it ends the existence of those punished, instead of temporarily imprisoning them. By imposing the death penalty the individual does not learn from their mistakes and neither does society.

Moreover, there are no reliable methods to measure the effectiveness of the death penalty as a deterrent of future crimes. People who commit capital murders generally do not engage in probability analysis concerning the likelihood of getting the death penalty in they are caught. In Louisiana, for example, during the summer of 1978, eight people were executed. During that same period the murder rate in New Oilcans rose 16.9%, the highest in years. Most of the costs of the death penalty are incurred before and during the trial, not in the appeals process after convicted. A 1982 New York study estimated the death penalty cost conservatively at three times that of life imprisonment, the ratio that Texas (with a system that is on the brink of collapse due to under-funding) has experienced. As Anderson points out the monetary cost of appealing a capital sentence is excessive. Further actual monetary costs are trumped by the importance of doing justice.

Additionally there are specific costs associated with keeping an inmate on death row, (i.e. the cost of the specially built prison blocks, the need for maximum security, etc.) and more. These costs clearly outweigh the regular costs incurred to house a regular inmate. With the millions spent executing prisoners, the government could use that money more effectively trying to solve violent crimes, and developing methods to improve public safety. Society demands that the punishment should fix the harm it has done. By sentencing a person to death no harm has been fixed. You cannot bring the murdered person back by taking the prisoner's life. Punishment-regardless of the motivation is not intended to revenge, offset, or compensate for the victims suffering or to be measured by it.

The community demands that justice be served. Would justice not equally be served and in fact may be better served by life imprisonment? I believe it would be a worse punishment to endure a life sentence in prison. The individual is deprived of his liberty. Pie will then suffer and live the rest of his or her life within three lonely walls and a set of bars. It gives the individual time to think and wallow in his own guilt. Someone kills another person.

The State then proceeds to kill him for doing so. This is not punishment but revenge. Revenge is inconsistent with society's demands that justice be served because the punishment has to fit the crime. Justice Brennan has insisted that the death penalty is uncivilized, inhuman, and inconsistent with human dignity and with the dignity of life. Brennan speaks of moral imperatives. It is morally wrong for someone to kill another person. If so, then the state is committing a morally wrongful act. As they say, two wrongs don't make a right. Society desires for its members to reintegrate themselves into society. Punishment includes preparing the person to reenter society and lead a productive life. Without doubt, if you impose the death penalty there is no opportunity for rehabilitation.